Adventist Hospitals Work to Influence National Healthcare Policy

Question: The Adventist Health Policy Association, representing five major Adventist health systems in the US, presented its ideas for healthcare policy and reform to members of Congress recently. In a nutshell, what do you believe needs to change in healthcare in America, and how should the focus be adjusted?

Answer: We might be able to put this in a “nutshell” if the nut is very large. The big message is that we need to redirect some of the immense sums of money and time we invest in healthcare to the work of disease, accident, and violence prevention and the work of health promotion.

Our nation is more ready for this move than at any time in my memory. The reason is that more policy makers understand that we must find more cost-effective ways to secure health for our nation’s citizens. Of course, thoughtful people have made this case for decades. But the financial incentives simply didn’t foster investments in health promotion. There was little or no monetary reward for efforts to prevent encounters with illness care.

Now this is beginning to change. And the five Adventist health systems are prepared to help lead the way.

Your 72-page booklet, titled Five Steps to Health in America, listed 75 recommendations to "improve the physical, emotional and spiritual health of the communities we serve." That's a lot of recommendations. How did the Adventist Health Policy Association decide on these specific ideas?

Each of the five hospitals and healthcare systems convened focus groups of knowledgeable professionals who work at the intersection of healthcare and public policy. From the work of these groups, we developed the framework of the “five steps” within which we organized the 75 proposals.

Your group met 40 congressional officers on October 21 to present the document. Was that a good turnout? Did it meet your expectations? What do you think the members of congress will do with the booklet and its suggestions? What impact do you expect it to have? Are the Adventist health systems you represent a big enough chunk of American healthcare to catch the attention of the national government?

Let me answer the last of those questions first: Yes the five systems do represent a potentially powerful force for good in the arena of health policy. One of the systems (Adventist Health System) is the largest Protestant faith-inspired healthcare organization in the nation, and it includes one of the largest private hospitals in the country. Taken together, the five systems represent over 80 hospitals, hundreds of clinics, and well over 100,000 employees. Often our healthcare institutions are among the largest private employers in their region. So, yes, this magnitude of healthcare services does get the attention of the nation’s policy makers. But there is a much more important reason than the size of the Adventist systems. We are known for our commitments to health promotion, disease prevention, and community health development. We have well over a century of experience in this work. And there is evidence that we are trusted to do the work well.

And yes, we were pleased with the participation of all five of the Adventist systems, all of which sent representatives to Washington, DC for “Advocacy Day.” We were able to visit with over 40 offices and more than two dozen members of Congress or their staffs. As might be expected, we concentrated our efforts on those members of Congress who have Adventist facilities in their districts or states. This is the second year we have made the trek to Capitol Hill, and I believe we are learning to be more effective in this work. The number of participants on our teams increased this year, including CEOs who joined in the work.

One of the main purposes of the Five Steps to Health in America was to present non-partisan initiatives that we believe are both aspirational and potentially transformational. We were met with considerable gratitude for the work. One congressman from Missouri, for example, voiced his appreciation because he said he felt he and his colleagues needed some fresh ideas in the often highly charged environment of our current political scene. Others expressed both surprise and thanks for the fact that instead of asking for some special favors, we were offering our services.

Beyond whatever effects the booklet may have in the various offices of Congress and with the presidential campaigns to which the work was also given, there was the energizing reality of having our five systems work together to clarify what we see to be our best opportunities for the betterment of our nation’s health.

Besides the presentation a few weeks ago, how else are you getting your policy recommendations into the hands of lawmakers?

The process of sharing our perspectives on healthcare reform doesn’t begin or end in a day. This is ongoing work that the Adventist Health Policy Association is doing constantly. Representatives from each of the five Adventist systems meet telephonically on a regular basis to ensure continuing collaboration on many different issues. We believe that it’s imperative for our nation’s leaders to understand that we are eager to collaborate in evidence-based interventions for whole community health. Going forward, we will be seeking other avenues for sharing this basic commitment which is an outgrowth of our Adventist faith.

Why is it important to have this dialogue with American lawmakers?

Most members of the US Congress are not experts in healthcare. They are constantly pressured by special interest groups. Our hope is that we can be influential in providing information and proposals that are genuinely motivated by an abiding commitment to improve health outcomes in communities all across the nation.

Do you feel that members of the Adventist Health Policy Association, including its 84 hospitals and 400 other health centers and entities, are already implementing these policies to the extent possible?

The answer would have to be a mixture of Yes and No. We are in a period a major transition. One executive described this as having one foot on the dock of the existing payment system and another foot on a boat that is headed into new waters. Along with all healthcare organizations in our nation, the Adventist systems are navigating their way through this time of transition. The advantage we have, in my view, is the foundational purpose that gave rise to Adventist health ministries — namely our faith.

What impact do you feel the upcoming US presidential election is having/will have on healthcare policy in America?

Well, the topic will certainly be front and center again. And this will give us new opportunities to express our convictions about focusing on health and not just healthcare.

Has the Adventist Health Policy Association, since its founding five years ago, previously made similar recommendations/presentations to congress?

Since the Adventist Health Policy Association (AHPA) was founded, it has produced a steady stream of position statements and policy briefs. Examples of these can be found on the organization’s website. And in addition to the organizing “Advocacy Day” for two years, there have been many other communications with members of Congress and with policy makers in various departments of government at both the federal and state levels.

Does the Adventist Health Policy Association have any full-time staffers and/or a permanent presence on Capitol Hill?

Some of our systems do engage individuals or firms that help to convey our messages at both the state and federal levels of policy making. AHPA itself does have full-time employees, but they do not spend most of their time on Capitol Hill.

Do you feel that the Adventist health message has evolved over time in its basic principles? As the tenets of wholistic health and preventative medicine gain more adherents generally, are they receiving more widespread acceptance? Or are they becoming subsumed by the way healthcare is now generally perceived, and thus less relevant as it is no longer unique?

My belief is that the Adventist health message has developed an increasingly strong basis in evidence that has been gathered over decades of diligent work. I’m often amazed these days by the high level of interest in principles we Adventists have espoused for generations. Paradoxically, at the same time, we live in a society beset by a rising epidemic of poor health resulting from lifestyles that lead to chronic diseases.

The basic tenets of the Adventist health message are not going out of style. They are increasingly being recognized as effective for better health and greater longevity. But it would be impossible to contend that these principles are being adopted by the vast majority of our fellow citizens. There is a lot of work to do!

You are the vice president for mission and culture for Loma Linda University Medical Center and director of the Institute for Health Policy and Leadership at Loma Linda. What do you most like about your job/s? What do you find the most challenging? Did you help to create the Adventist Health Policy Association?

I wish I could claim to have helped with the founding of AHPA. But others have this distinction. I’m proud of what AHPA has accomplished and of its current goals.

The Loma Linda University Institute for Health Policy and Leadership was established in large measure to aid AHPA in its work by having an academic institute, with faculty scholars sharing their expertise. I’m pleased to have helped with the founding of the Institute. I have been working in different roles within what we now call Loma Linda University Health (our corporate name for our University and its health system) for over 25 years. And this is now my 47th year as a professor in Adventist higher education.

Since I genuinely enjoy nearly all of my work, it’s impossible to single out one superlative aspect. But I’d answer your question this way: I find greatest satisfaction in taking the best of Adventist beliefs and seeking to make them practical in our world. My academic field is Christian ethics. My work in health policy is simply an outgrowth of the belief that our ethical convictions are not intended only for the elevated towers of academic reflection, but should find expression in the ways they shape better lives for whole communities. I believe this is why Jesus sent out His disciples to share the good news of the Kingdom and to heal.

Note: The members of the Adventist Health are comprised of Adventist Health in the northwest with 19 hospitals; Adventist Health System with 45 hospitals, including Florida Hospital, the nation's largest Medicare provider; Adventist Healthcare with five hospitals in the MidAtlantic states; Kettering Health Network in Ohio, with eight hospitals; and Loma Linda University Health with seven hospitals in southern California.

Photo: Dr. Gerald Winslow and Dr. Wonha Kim at Capitol Hill. Dr. Kim is Associate Director of the Institute for Health Policy and Leadership.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

The two major issues I have with this are…

  1. Why should my money be taken away from me to improve someone else’s life? Surely they should be paying for it themselves.

  2. Since hospitals and hospital employees and other main stream medical institutes - especially CEO’s etc. - make their money by being paid to treat sick people, why should I believe that they are trying to reduce the number of sick people?

I can see two arguments addressing (1) - that it really isn’t my money that is being taken away, but rather I am being charged for various benefits society is providing me, and (2) - that improving their lives will improve mine, and that I should be charged for this benefit

But I find it hard to find a valid argument addressing (2) because I have been involved in other forms of government industry collaboration in the computer industry, and as near as I could tell the industry employees had nothing other than their own income as their primary motive.

I expect the traditional medical organizations to try to sabotage this initiative, not promote it - until they can explain to me what is in it for them.

When I see an organization that is simultaneously trying to get paid for lowing the incidence of sickness AND get paid for treating sick people, I see an organization with conflicting goals.

It is not true that the uninsured are clogging the nations ER’s.

1 Like

Failure to recognize that preventing illness saves everyone in the long run. Working to prevent diabetes and heart disease is far less costly when these have become more difficult and expensive to treat. Preventing childhood diseases by proper nutrition is another way to ensure that they will not later experience adult problems for life. It is very short-sighted to only treat diseases after they have taken their toll on the body.

Hospitals have a financially vested interest in disease prevention as they have to treat diseases when they are often more advanced. They are cooperating with health insurance to prevent hospitalizations on which they too often lose money. The largest users of the ER are the indigents who use it as their last resort when unable to pay for visits to the physician’s office.

The old saying is never more true in sickness today: “Pay now or pay more later.”

I think this is to attempt to encourage a change of thinking, a change of approach to health.
The American dollars are treating AFTER an illness sticks.
Lately Radio ads have been saying that persons with a Primary Care physician have fewer incidences of illnesses, especially those that require hospitalizations – with all that entails, including surgery, ICU, and long term after care – to expensive testings, to the long term debilitation that some illness cause resulting in Home Health Care, and some type of long term institutional care such as Nursing Home, or even Skilled Care.
Many books on health today say that many diseases and their side effects are just due to the American Diet. Which is a See Food Diet. – See it, Eat it. Unfortunately low income persons, for many reasons, have poor nutritional diets. One big one is having Food Stamp Cards, but no grocery stores handy, so use Convenience Stores for their nutritional services.
One can be over weight and still be in a “malnourished”, “starving” physical state.
Many Food Stamp persons have no transportation other than taxi, or city bus. And using the city bus is $3 to $4 a round trip, and takes a half day for the round trip. And one can only get what one can carry while walking from Grocery to Bus Stop and from Bus Stop to home, which might be quite a distance. One might already be semi feeble, so that is quite a task.

Teaching persons How to stay well, prevent Inflammatory Illnesses [arthritis, clogged arteries of heart, neck, brain, legs, Diabetes, Lung disease of chronic bronchitis leading to COPD, others] will save huge amounts of Medical Dollars that are spent by Medicare, Medicaid, Indigent care…
Looking at the Availability of real Grocery Stores in a community is another need. Dollar Tree and Dollar General are doing some of this, but that is on a Corporate basis. Not necessarily done on a “Where do people need a grocery? Type need.” Community studies would be helpful with this. And persons could still use their Food Stamp cards at these places.

It is unfortunate, that Seventh day Adventists have had a Health Message for over 125 years. We have all of our churches scattered around the world [lots in the United States – many huge ones] and yet even with Loma Linda School of Public Health, which SDA church is a Fully Implemented Public Health Education School/Provider for their community, even the few blocks around the church property?

We should have been in the lead for Public Health Education, BEEN THE Public Health Educator for years.

But as a Denomination there has been no interest in doing this. No interest in promoting this. No interest in training lay person to present simple truths that could save people’s lives.
The Seventh day Adventist Church Denomination — World Wide – should have been a demonstration a Century ago as to How To Do Public Health for the Public Health.
It should have been Mobilized 50 years ago.

We say we have The Truth, but we “hide it under a bushel” as the song says.
THIS is WHY we have no business going to the Government with this Issue. The Government should have been coming to Seventh day Adventists.

PS-- Also Insurance Agencies.

1 Like

I was hoping to see how the AHPA recommendations compared to Ben Carson’s “plan.” I’ve visited Carson’s website and read the details, but I struggled to make sense of them. I’m inclined to think Carson would pay attention to the AHPA recommendations, but until someone divulges as much, I’m left scratching my head.

1 Like