Adventist Organizations Receive Millions in Federal Paycheck Protection Loans Despite Religious Liberty Concerns

General Conference and North American Division entities, along with dozens of Adventist academies, conferences, and independent ministries, received millions of federal dollars from the CARES ACT Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) designed to keep workers employed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Adventist organizations obtained the funds despite a strong NAD recommendation that church organizations abstain from participation in the program due to religious liberty concerns.

According to data released last week by the U.S. Treasury Department, NAD entities that received funding are Pacific Press and the Adventist Media Center, each netting between $1 million to $2 million.  GC entities that benefited from the program are ADRA and a medical clinic listed as the General Corp. of Seventh-day Adventists in Guam, both of which received between $1 million to $2 million. Independent ministries on the list include Amazing Facts and 3ABN, which also separately received between $1 million and $2 million, and Weimar Institute, which received $350,000 to $1 million.

The Adventist entities listed in the government database are among thousands of religious organizations to receive the forgivable loans through the $659 billion stimulus program, the first of its kind to cover the salaries of church workers, according to a recent article in Christianity Today. The database categorizes the dollars received according to range of funding and not specific amounts, with tiers of $150,000 to $350,000, $350,000 to $1 million, $1 million to $2 million, $2 million to $5 million, and $5 million to $10 million.

Any small business with 500 or fewer employees may be eligible for a PPP loan, including faith-based organizations, according to government officials. The program, administered by the Small Business Administration (SBA), forgives the loans based on certain criteria such as employee retention.

This program “provides small businesses with funds to pay up to 8 weeks of payroll costs including benefits,” according to information on the U.S. Department of Treasury website. “Funds can also be used to pay interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities.”

Spectrum analyzed the allocations via a searchable chart designed specifically to track Adventist organizations receiving the funding. It contains information for entities owned by the denomination as well as independent ministries.

The chart, included at the end of this article, was created by downloading data from the government website — which identifies organizations that received $150,000 or more — and cross-referencing it with data from Adventist datasets available through the AdventistYearbook and eAdventist. Entities receiving less than $150,000 were not identified by the SBA due to privacy concerns, according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. Five news organizations, including The New York Times and The Washington Post, are suing the SBA for access to government records regarding who received funding and the exact amounts.

Due to the complications of searching some church entities because of name variations, etc. — in addition to the government not identifying organizations receiving smaller loans — the chart is not comprehensive. However, it does provide a sense of the widespread acceptance of federal dollars among Adventist organizations, despite the NAD’s recommendation and the denomination’s long-standing preoccupation with the separation of church and state.

The chart remains a work in progress and can be updated to include specific independent ministries that may not have been part of the cross-referencing.

Currently, the denominational chart lists 55 Adventist entities. Combined, those organizations have retained 7,499 jobs because of the funding, according to the data collected from the SBA website.

In total, the organizations and independent ministries listed in the denominational chart received between $54 million to $121 million.

While the GC remained silent regarding whether SDA entities should accept the funding, the NAD issued an April 8 statement admonishing churches, schools, and administrative offices to refrain from tapping into the funds, making an exception for money covering childcare and extended sick leave.

“Many church leaders and members have concerns regarding both restrictions and conditions surrounding the acceptance of this government aid,” the statement reads. “In addition, there have been questions regarding how receiving this money fits into the Seventh-day Adventist Church’s longstanding and historic commitment to the separation of church and state.

“It is the North American Division administration’s recommendation to abstain from participation in both of these federal financial assistance programs,” the statement continues, referring to federal funds available through both the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES) and the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA). “While the risk associated with this money is uncertain, NAD leadership’s primary concern is remaining faithful to the counsel we’ve been given regarding church-state relations.”

When contacted with questions about at least two NAD entities accepting the funds, NAD Communication Director Dan Weber referred Spectrum back to the division’s statement.

“So, what we’ve decided to do is we’re not going to comment,” he said in a phone interview. “We will refer you back to our statement.… It was a guideline from the division saying, ‘This is what we ask you to consider; this is how we feel about it. But we ask that you prayerfully consider it before you decide to apply for the money or not.’”

He said Pacific Press and the Adventist Media Center are both entities of the NAD, but they have boards to which they report, and it would have taken a voted action to apply for the money.

In a separate interview, Karnik Doukmetzian, who serves as general counsel for both the GC and NAD, said the NAD statement speaks for itself, therefore he saw no need to comment further on that issue. He said the clinic in Guam is an operation that was entitled to funds and has continued to serve the people of that island by receiving the money.

“So, I don’t have any answer for them; they made that application themselves,” he said. “It just happens to have the General Conference name on it.”

Another recipient of the funds, listed as “General Conference of Seventh-day,” located in Mount Dora, FL, also received $1 million to $2 million. However, unlike the clinic in Guam, it is not a GC entity, Doukmetzian said. Instead, it is a listing for the Southeastern Conference.

“And that’s not a General Conference entity, it’s a local conference within the Southern Union,” he said. “So I’m not sure why they listed the General Conference in that one. It was clearly an error.”

Regarding the PPP funds, Doukmetzian explained why the GC refrained from releasing a statement.

“Well, the PPP is an American thing,” he explained. “The GC let North America take the lead on it. They issued the statement with which the GC concurred.”

The denominational chart lists 10 Adventist academies that each received between $150,000 and $350,000, and four that received between $350,000 and $1 million. Among them are Dakota Adventist Academy in Bismarck, North Dakota, Greater Miami Adventist Academy in Miami, Florida, Highland Academy in Portland, Tennessee, Madison Academy in Madison, Tennessee, Forest Lake Academy in Apopka, Florida, and Milo Adventist Academy in Days Creek, Oregon.

Five NAD conferences received between $350,000 million to $1 million. Nine received $1 million to $2 million.

Four conferences — Alleghany East, Kentucky-Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and Southern California — received between $2 million to $5 million. In addition, another three — Potomac, Southeastern California, and Northeastern — received between $5 million to $10 million.

The four universities on the list — Pacific Union College, Southwestern Adventist University, Union College, and Washington Adventist University — all received between $2 million to $5 million.

Alan J. Reinach is executive director of the Church State Council, an Adventist religious liberty educational and advocacy arm of the Pacific Union Conference, representing five western states. He said there is a lot of confusion surrounding the Adventist position regarding government funding.

“On the one hand, historically our church has been strongly supportive of the separation of church and state,” Reinach said. “And, those of us in Religious Liberty have strongly advocated for the historic no-aid to religion principle, which really goes back to colonial times and the founding of the Constitution.

“Having said that,” he continued, “NAD working policy, for as long as I’ve been here and longer — and I’ve been here since the early ’90s — has never adopted an absolutist position on no-aid to religion. And so, when several of us in Religious Liberty were analyzing the Payment Protection Plan, we came to the conclusion that accepting the funds would be consistent with NAD Working Policy.”

Reinach said the NAD recommendation reflects the historic view of remaining independent of government funding, and he does not have a problem with that stance.

“At the same time, the organization — faced with the prospect of potential layoffs and economic harm — had a real-world decision to make about a risk-reward assessment,” he said.

The PPP loans had no strings directly attached, Reinach explained. Though that could change in the future, the NAD and other Adventist organizations grappled with the possibility of laying off hourly-wage workers who would be the first to go due to COVID-19 restrictions.

“I’m a plaintiff’s employment lawyer; I represent workers,” he said. “... So, my heart is with our rank-and-file employees who are the ones who were going to suffer for the principled decision of Administration not to take money. 

“I can see plenty of reason on both sides of the thing — either to refrain from taking the money or applying for the money,” he said. “I think there are good rationales on both sides, frankly. And I don’t think there should be any aspersions on organizations that did take the money; or, for that matter, any criticism of those who decided, ‘No. We’re going to tough it out.’”


CHART: Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loan Data for Adventist Entities

Use the arrows at the top and bottom right to view additional pages in the chart. Use the scroll bars along the side and bottom to view additional rows and columns of data. The chart is organized first according to the tiered loan ranges, and then by entity name in alphabetical order within their respective tier ranges. It can also be viewed in its own browser window here.


Editor’s Note: Spectrum has been approved for a $30,700 PPP loan.


Alva James-Johnson is an award-winning journalist who has worked for several newspapers across the country. She is a life-long Seventh-day Adventist, active in the church, along with her husband and two young-adult children. Contact her at [email protected].

Photo by Karolina Grabowska from Pexels


We invite you to join our community through conversation by commenting below. We ask that you engage in courteous and respectful discourse. You can view our full commenting policy by clicking here.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

Not to forget the millions of dollars we continue to get from tax deductions.

1 Like

To view the chart, please refer to the article on our website (rather than the Discourse version above):

Its give and take. For more than 150 years the SDA church is getting the money for the US so now is the time to take care of the SDA church. And this church keep on selling that Religious Liberty to its members.


This is the perfect time to form a Compliance Committee on PPL loans NOW that these SDA entities have received the monies and can be exempted. :wink:


The NAD Statement is probably the worst misadventure in stewardship in the history of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. All of the imbecilities written about by Douglas Hackleman in his excellent book pale in comparison to the NAD Statement.

I look forward to a story that provides a calculation of the corresponding economic loss suffered by those SDA entities that heeded the NAD’s foolish advice.


I wonder if the large sums of money received is the reason why the church has allowed worship to be regarded as "unessential?" Instead of churches become centers of health and healing they have been silenced with closed doors. When there is money to be received just for the asking, we can close our doors to public ministry to the millions of fearful and troubled faith seekers. We can be publicly regarded as unnecessary and a source for the spread of disease, instead of a part of the solution in educating and helping the community to cope with a pandemic. Is it possible for the sake of money to supplant God and worship? Could not churches provide a safer environment then Walmart?


When the Bush administration stretched its olive branch to faith based organizations for federal support in governmental functions, boy didn’t that open a can of worms! As non-governmental entities, these faith based organizations are also exempted from discrimination protections for their employees.
Although the supreme court recently ruled on a narrow interpretation of trans gender protection, the door remains wide open for further religious objection lawsuits.
Aside from that muddle, these loan forgivable tax dollars are allowed to be diverted to religious schools of various sorts, in violation of church state separation. Protestant tax payers fund Catholic schools, Hebrew congregations fund protestant schools, Mosque and Synagogue support violates the religious objections of Islamaphobe and anti semitic tax payers. The point overlooked is the fact that each individual player recieved $1200 directly from the treasury department, and an extra $600 above the Unemployment claim for a limited time, thank you to the House of Representatives! When religious entities apply for forgivable federal loans, they are aiding in the depletion of the program that steals away the opportunity for small businesses with investments that cannot just pick up and run into a new adventure. Just imagine the investments tied up in equipment for restaurants, as an example, with about 20% projected to eventually fail.
Paul the Apostle would roll in his grave to see the remnant church receiving government handout, an anathema to the Libertarian concept of the nanny state. Even when church schools receive ‘choice’ vouchers, this appalling practice violates the founding framers of our law. This proves that the remnant is yet to be grounded in its own principles and its understanding between the differences of what constitutes a democracy and what constitutes a theocracy, but that is another study!


Excellent remarks. Thank you. I’m sure, like you powerfully stated, there’s more to our balance sheets to help us determine our approach to the issue of whether our churches should re-open or re-close.

It would be an interesting statistic, to be sure.

On the other hand, I can’t get particularly broken up about entities of the denomination falling into default and vanishing from the scene. The church has been far too arrogant for far too long about it’s supposed elevated place, among churches and nations, as “the remnant.” Now might be as good a time as any for a comeuppance of sorts.


A note to recipients: Please don’t approach me asking for donations. By accepting money raised by taxes, you have already forced it out of my wallet, left me no choice, and demonstrated that our respective perceptions of how God operates are entirely different.


Hoo boy, that GC quote.

“Well, the PPP is an American thing,” he explained. “The GC let North America take the lead on it."

Mm-hmm. Funny how that works when they don’t care to comment on a subject.

Otherwise, they’d tell South America and Africa to shut their holes when American conferences vote to allow local ordination for women. Because, you know, those policies only affect their own conference’s local churches. Much like the PPP, it’s an American thing.

Either grow a spine and lead all the time, or grow a spine and stand up to the world church. Pick one, GC.


I see no problem with SDA organizations receiving government loans to save 7,500 jobs in a time of crisis. But I would have a problem if that money were not repaid. While the government may allow the loan to become a grant, it is a historic core American Adventist belief that the state should not financially support religious organizations. So to accept the money as a grant would be a repudiation of our principles of religious liberty. Those organizations who received the funds have a moral obligation to repay them as the economy improves.

1 Like

Mnuchin is already talking about forgiving these loans. At the very least, SDA organizations that received tax payer money ought to publicly post how they used the money… employee salaries? tuition scholarships? capital improvement projects? Etc.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed after 7 days. New replies are no longer allowed.