After Thorough Process, Updated Pastoral Ethics Document Voted

The International Board of Ministerial and Theological Education (IBMTE) voted on April 4 to accept adjustments made to a Ministerial Association document on Pastoral Ethics, in its session at the Seventh-day Adventist Church headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland, United States. The voted action capped a thorough vetting process that involved extensive discussions, and consultations across several church departments and regions for a couple of years.

The Pastoral Ethics document is an appendix to the more comprehensive IBMTE Handbook and its chapter “Denominational Statement for Endorsement Process.” The Handbook addresses the entire process, curriculum and outcomes of pastoral formation, whereas endorsement pertains to those who teach religion and theology. “[Endorsement] is a means by which those who teach pastors affirm and confess their faith,” said Benjamin Schoun, former chair of the IBMTE, who chaired the Handbook revision process.

Geoffrey Mbwana, who now chairs the IBMTE, explained that the Handbook is a dynamic document “as times change and realities come to view.” “We went back and looked at the Handbook and saw what we needed to update, and the process was global,” he said.

Education director of the world church Lisa Beardsley-Hardy agreed, as she explained that the goal of the board was “to listen to the needs of the field, to be responsive to that, [and] to adapt to it.” She reminded that the process involved “reviewing the Handbook page by page […] to ensure that what we're doing in preparing pastors is concordant with mission needs around the world.”

Adjustments to the Pastoral Code of Ethics

While the first version of the Pastoral Code of Ethics was recommended by the Ministerial Association in 1992, every time a new edition is prepared, some adjustments are made to the text, said Anthony Kent, associate secretary of the Ministerial Association at the General Conference, and responsible for crafting the wording of the updated document. “The Code of Ethics has been refined and expanded on several occasions, most notably in 1997 with the publication of the Seventh-day Adventist Minister’s Handbook and in 2009 when it was revised,” he said.

The version voted by the IBMTE on April 4 tries to make room for regional differences in procedures in pastoral and ministerial practice while advocating for a unified system of ethical principles. Particularly in the Pastoral Code of Ethics, the board made its best effort to make the language clearer. For example, the phrase “Give full time and attention to the ministry as my only vocation” was changed to “Abide by my employing organization’s employment policies.”

Some document statements were made more comprehensive than before. “Relate with propriety to those of the opposite sex” became “Relate with propriety to all those I encounter.”

The major significant changes to the text, however, are included in the “Ethics and the Law” section of the document, with a completely new sub-section on “Child Safety,” and revamped sub-sections on what now are called “Physical Facilities,” “Supervision,” and “Staff Background.”

The “Child Safety” paragraph reminds everyone that “in many countries, it is a legal requirement for those working with children […], to attain a police check or equivalent clearance from a government entity.” Thus, pastors ministering in such countries are reminded “to ensure they have the necessary legal clearance to minister to children.” The sub-section also explains that irrespective of any legal requirement enforced by local authorities, “the minister’s physical contact, behavior, conversation and ministry with children needs to exemplify the highest moral, professional and Christian standards.”

“We need to have clear statements about what our expectations are for protecting children and [what constitutes] ethical behavior towards children,” said Beardsley-Hardy.

Both the “Physical Facilities” and “Supervision” sub-sections try to use vocabulary that makes the physical and emotional well-being of everyone involved in church activities a priority. At the same time, they strive to protect the church from legal liability.

Finally, the updated version of the Staff Background sub-section reminds that “one way to avoid problems with employees or volunteers is to be aware of their background.” Consequently, a careful vetting process may inform the selection of employees or volunteers, helping to “avoid problems with those who are unfit for service.”

“Pastors and theological teachers are held to high ethical standards, and the updated document clarifies the ethical expectations for how they conduct themselves,” said Beardsley-Hardy.

A Word on the Process

The process of updating the Handbook and associated documents on pastoral and ministerial training started in 2015, as an IBMTE Handbook revision task force met at Andrews University for the first session of discussion in July 2015. Subsequent meetings in the Philippines, Australia, and Kenya in late 2015 and early 2016 shaped the documents step by step, as suggestions were discussed and often incorporated. As part of this process, a dialogue session with scholars also took place in Atlanta, Georgia, United States in November 2015, at the annual meetings of the Adventist Society for Religious Studies and the Adventist Theological Society.

“[The IBMTE Handbook revision task force] had representation by expertise, by church administrative levels, by region, by the broad areas of ministry,” said Mbwana, as he stressed that the International Board of Ministerial and Theological Education worked “very intentionally” to appoint task force members with the most variety of backgrounds as possible.

Beardsley-Hardy explained that among the board members were people from every relevant area. “We had both men and women representing theological education, pastoral ministry, and those serving in chaplaincy,” she said.

Mbwana said he believes that this process, while painstaking, is essential. “The way the Seventh-day Adventist Church does its work is through committees,” he said. “We don’t elect or appoint a king who then makes all these pronouncements. We work through committees.”

Kent also emphasized the consultative nature of the process. “The General Conference Ministerial Association received input from pastors, church administrators and Office of General Counsel (OGC), as well as Adventist Risk Management Service. It has been a thorough process,” he said.

This story was written by Marcos Paseggi (Senior Correspondent, Adventist Review), and originally published on It is reprinted here with permission.

If you respond to this article, please:

Make sure your comments are germane to the topic; be concise in your reply; demonstrate respect for people and ideas whether you agree or disagree with them; and limit yourself to one comment per article, unless the author of the article directly engages you in further conversation. Comments that meet these criteria are welcome on the Spectrum Website. Comments that fail to meet these criteria will be removed.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

this reminds me of a General SS lesson at LLU, A Woman was giving the general lesson study. the topic was raising children… She kept saying she was in favor of capital punishment of children if correctly applied.


A code of ethics cannot be a a re-worked policy manual. Practical elements in pastoral decision making and accountability must be included. .This move to develop a code of ethics and conduct may very well be a response to a heartfelt concern to present a list of “uniform”, “standardized”, and “appropriate” “corporate” values in a diverse and growing Adventist culture. Even when the movement towards the introduction of codes could be motivated by the best and most noble of reasons and yet fail because the basic requirement is lacking. The basic requirement for a Code of Ethics for Pastors has to express the fundamental principles that provide guidance in cases where no specific rule is in place or where matters are genuinely unclear.


Updating ethics issues can address legal, marketing & media issues.
Updating homiletic issues would address back door & tithe issues.

Until more SDA get out of the institutional box to see how poor the sermons are, they will lack the perspective & sensitivity on how much improvement is really required.


I notice 3 likes attached to your post. It would be interesting to find out if they are institutional , in the box fans.
What is unending are the stereotypical Laodicean labels attached to SDA members and the often reminders for the need of revival & reformation.

My response…

"It has often been presented to me that there should be less sermonizing by ministers, acting merely as local pastors of churches, and that greater personal efforts should be put forth. Our people should not be made to think that they need to listen to a sermon every Sabbath. Many who listen frequently to sermons, even though the truth be presented in clear lines, learn but little. Often it would be more profitable if the Sabbath meetings were of the nature of a Bible-class study. Bible truth should be presented in such a simple, interesting manner that all can easily understand and grasp the principles of salvation.

We should seek to follow more closely the example of Christ, the great Shepherd, as He worked with His little company of disciples, studying with them and with the people the Old Testament Scriptures. His active ministry consisted not merely in sermonizing, but in educating the people." LT 192 1906… (Notice the date–EGW has heard plenty of sermons by then)

If you realize that my hobby horse/rant regarding homiletics is unending, then possibly you might have read what my input has been on advice: competent, contemporary relevant verse by verse expository teaching.
The OT clue is NEH 8:8. The NT clue is 2 Tim 4:2. Many pastors claim to do this but their messages are basically “bible based” theological therapy, nurture, topical sermons. Because so many members are of the world, pastors feel the need to muddy the water with entertaining stories or anecdotes.

I will admit to having heard 6 SDA pastors who have presented competent expository sermons. The great majority of pastors still present non fat dry milk typical topical sermons loaded with obscure/ambiguous clichés & platitudes.

I again challenge pastors and/or ministerial secretaries to implement sermon reviews by the audiences.

The absence of members at Sabbath school is another indication of poor teaching approaches.

1 Like

This is still your unending theme, answer to every issue, and continuing response. Who are you holding up as models?


I suppose that the church is trying trying to fix problems BUT really it is a huge and complex issue. I doubt mere mortals can have much effect. To the point.
Question…why are women’s ministry leaders in the SPD BEING REPLACED BY MEN? Why are the abuse issues in the island missions never mentioned.
. Just two of many ice-berg tips for those looking for them! (Dose 'it’s cultural’make it ok?) l


My grandmother (she died in 1994) remembers the same speaker. She would go off into fits of giggles recalling, “Use capital punishment only as a last resort.