Gospel of the Disappointment

Every year, October 22 marks a teachable moment for those of us who have lived in hope of something that hasn’t yet happened — and that we may have begun to doubt ever will.

The day is, of course, the anniversary of what we Adventists call “The Great Disappointment.” According to their interpretation of prophecy, early Adventists were fully expecting Jesus to return on this date in 1844. To call His failure to appear as expected a “disappointment” is perhaps a grave understatement. More accurate names might be “The Great Annihilation of Hope” or “The Great Theological Mistake Big Enough to End the Whole Discussion” or “The Great Challenge That If It Doesn’t Break You Will Make You Stronger.”

And yet, as great as this disappointment might have been for those living through it, two fundamental challenges faced by first century Christians were much, much more disappointing.

The first extraordinary disappointment was the execution of Jesus Christ. Their beloved leader was killed. Dead. Pretty hard to come back from that. (Cue the resurrection and the restoration of hope.) The second disappointment, the same one later faced by the early Adventists, was that after the miracle of His resurrection and ascent into heaven, Jesus didn’t come back. Even though He had promised that He would. And even though His followers — and this is important — were doing everything they could to cause Him to return. Their actions seemed to change nothing.

For some, this disappointing set of circumstances meant cutting their losses, bailing out of the faith, and never looking back. But for those persuaded that Jesus was unlike anyone they had ever encountered before and utterly worth following no matter what, abandoning the faith simply wasn’t an option. So they tried to make some sense of their disappointment.

The various apostles and writers of the New Testament dealt with disappointment differently.

For Mark, writing nearest to the death of Christ, it was an opportunity to understand the dynamic of the messianic secret and to embrace the mystery of this extraordinary and unprecedented occurrence: God with us. Matthew focused on the importance of followers living lives that were so enthused with Christ that they became Christ to the world and had the same impact on those whose lives they touched as Christ had had on theirs. For Luke, disappointment created the opportunity to search for meaning in history and the ultimate redemption of humankind. Paul, who was not one of the Twelve, saw the paradox of the gospel: Jesus’ death was a part of God’s mysterious plan; the weakest moment is actually the strongest; through His death, not His life, He has saved the world. For Peter, it was coming to a profound understanding of God’s true purpose. Peter’s emphasis is my favorite and is demonstrated through what the New Testament calls the bride of Christ (the church), for which Peter had special responsibility. Finally, John resolved his dissonance and disappointment in the personal search for meaning in the knowledge of Jesus Himself, creating a framework through which those who believe in Jesus were to present His claims of Lordship, and His gracious love, to the world in which they live.

What was then the original “Great Disappointment” can be seen as transformational. It brought about a defining spiritual moment in the lives of individuals who had to confront their disappointment and make something meaningful from it. We can draw lessons for our own lives from the positive way the diverse individuals who were with Jesus — not just the disciples but all those who followed Him as the One in whom they had placed all of their hopes — dealt with their despair.

Mark and Martha both call us to embrace the unknown circumstances of our journeys as disciples. Matthew and the woman at the well call us to exemplify the gracious character of Christ in our own lives. Luke and Mary the mother of Jesus ask us to look beyond the present moment to the horizon of our hopes, treasuring in our hearts that which is unattained but not unknown. Paul and Mary Magdalene call us to treasure the mystery of salvation in our hearts, valuing the upside-down-ness of a world in which the weakest are actually the strongest and the shadow of death is vanquished not by the sword but by the unquenchable, passionate light of love, however small its flicker might sometimes be. Peter calls us to be the church of Christ’s imagination — the bride who waits with patience and fidelity. And John, the beloved, reminds us that our life in Christ announces His saving grace to the whole world — even those who are experiencing disappointment and disillusionment.

So while October 22 is not a celebration, it’s not exactly a disappointment either. Call it a milestone. The journey of hope continues.

Ray Tetz is the director of communication and community engagement for the Pacific Union Conference. This essay originally appeared on Living God's Love, a blog by the Pacific Union Conference. It is reprinted here with permission. Image: Unsplash.com / Hannes Wolf

We invite you to join our community through conversation by commenting below. We ask that you engage in courteous and respectful discourse. You can view our full commenting policy by clicking here.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at http://spectrummagazine.org/node/9128

Raymond, always encouraging, last year and now–especially now.

The issue today is the theological mess they devised to alter their expectation. The Investigative Judgment is a greater con then the Millerite movement.,At least Wm Miller had the good sense to go backto what he knew—farming. Ellen Ehites sister knew better. She is the one that should be an example of dealing with hysteria.


Having been thoroughly indoctrinated into Adventism I can’t get through October 22 every year,(as well as the anniversaries of the Lisbon earthquake, the “falling” of the stars, and the “dark” day,) without thinking of my childhood education. Perhaps we can add to these signs of the end the Battle Creek decisions heralding the beginning of the shaking, the Sunday laws, laws forbidding Adventists to “buy or sell,” and the fleeing to the mountains. And the Adventist Review could devise an on-line count-down devise similar to the descending neon lights seen in Times Square on New Year’s Eve, not leading to a new year, but to the 2nd Coming.

Forgive my flight of fancy (and cynicism), Mr (or Pastor) Tetz. It’s very kind of you to remind us that when things were much worse, there were those who rose to the challenge. Perhaps there will be a time, as you suggest, that the Battle Creek decisions will not be viewed as a disappointment, but as a milestone.


Yea,Thomas, somebody other than me recognized (years ago) that the Investigative Judgment is a greater con than the Millerite movement. And until that non-biblical doctrine is recognized, this church will always be a cult.
It was all a figment of O.R.L Crosier’s imagination. But it gave the brethren (and sisters) an excuse for their error. Even Crosier recanted of his “doctrine” and even left the church.


Something we haven’t touched on is the EMPHASIS by Ellen that there is a
REAL 2-Compartment “Sanctuary” in heaven.
She says that UNTIL OCTOBER 22, 1844 Jesus sat on a throne that would
be in the position of the Table of Shewbread. Up until October 22, 1844 ALL
the Christian World prayed to Christ who was sitting on this Throne. Ellen
says on THAT DATE Christ MOVED to the Most Holy Place. The “Faithful”
followed Him to the Most Holy Place.
The rest of the Christian DID NOT. They STILL Prayed to Christ sitting on
the Shewbread Throne. Then SATAN TOOK HIS SEAT ON THAT THRONE.
And blew fake peace and light onto them. And Ellen says, they did NOT KNOW

When one reads Paul, Hebrews one gets the sense that the Sanctuary depicted
is “representative”. Paul gives the sense there is ONLY ONE “THRONE”, and
that the Father and Christ don’t move. Revelation actually says NO TEMPLE,
where ever the Trinity are, THEY ARE the Temple.
Hebrews was written to Jews, and used SYMBOLISMS they were familiar with.
Although, it was there for Gentiles to also read and be instructed.

Not sure about Judgment not beginning until 1844. Seems like when a person dies
that APPROVED or REJECTED could THEN be stamped next to their name.

In college, I had opportunity to read O.R,L. Crosier’s article. Was unaware that he
“recanted” it. Wish there was some way to read what he said in his “recant”. There
was “The Cornfield Vision” that was told to the disappointed group.

In the 6 years after the Disappointment, there was a lot of “NEW LIGHT” that came
to “the little flock”.
Willing to take INSTRUCTIONS.


Seventh-day Adventists: A denomination of people who, after 174 years, can still just not admit they were wrong…


Hey, you finally figure it out, uh? :laughing:
Welcome back my good friend. Your knowledge and wisdom were missed for a long time!


Steve, please don’t refer to your book, “Ellen White Says”, unless you give documentation where statements are found.

Reference to Crozier: http://www.whiteestate.org/pathways/jandrews.asp

We need all the hope we can get.

What a mess that would cause the SDA church. Since EGW endorsed it, correcting that error would be the first domino to set in motion other things.

It was not long after the passing of the time in 1844, that my first vision was given me… While we were praying, the power of [Yahuwah] came upon me as I had never felt it before…Soon we heard the voice of [Yahuwah] like many waters, which gave us the day and hour of [Yahushua’s] coming.
Life Sketches of Ellen G. White Chapter 7 (1915)

Matthew 24:36

36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.

Both things can’t be right, can they?

1 Like

Leroy – I thought that what I wrote was COMMON KNOWLEGE for those who were
familiar with her Early Writings.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed after 30 days. New replies are no longer allowed.