How Ellen White Coped with a Pandemic

In 1852 Ellen G. White’s youngest son, Edson, three years of age, fell victim to the third global cholera pandemic erupting across the United States, 1846-1860.[1] The White family, at the time, lived across the street from the Erie Canal in Rochester, New York. The first of the seven cholera pandemics flared up in India, near Calcutta, 1817-1824. From there, the contagion moved in all directions, often carried by migrating British Troops.[2] The third pandemic crossed the Atlantic, arriving in Quebec, then continued through the St. Lawrence River and its tributaries in Eastern Canada into the State of New York in the 1850s.[3] In a rented house on Hope Street, as the pandemic spread across Upstate New York, Ellen White penned, “The cholera visited the city, and while it raged, all night long the carriages bearing the dead were heard rumbling through the streets to Mount Hope Cemetery.”[4]

Millions of people died from the seven cholera pandemics. Of the people who developed cholera symptoms, 20% developed severe diarrhea, vomiting, and leg cramps, which led to dehydration, septic shock, and for some, within a matter of hours, death.[5] The people of Rochester felt helpless with no idea where cholera came from, how it entered the body, or what to do to ease the suffering it inflicted. The invisible enemy arrived silently, wreaking havoc on the Whites and the city of Rochester. Ellen White wrote:

“This disease did not cut down merely the low but took victims from every class of society. The most skillful physicians were laid low and borne to Mount Hope. As we passed through the streets in Rochester, at almost every corner, we would meet wagons with plain pine coffins in which to put the dead.”[6]

Her pain piled higher and more profound, watching Edson struggle. Desperately she sought refuge in her faith, writing:

“Our little Edson was attacked, and we carried him to the great Physician. I took him in my arms, and in the name of Jesus rebuked the disease. He felt relief at once, and as a sister commenced praying for the Lord to heal him, the little fellow of three years looked up in astonishment, and said, ‘They need not pray any more, for the Lord has healed me.’ He was very weak, but the disease made no further progress. Yet he gained no strength. Our faith was still to be tried. For three days he ate nothing.”[7]

As Ellen White and her husband battled with the cholera in Rochester, a medical doctor in London’s Soho district, John Snow, launched a plan of mapping the location of cholera cases from his practice. Cholera spread at an alarming rate through the streets of the city. In 1854 England suffered the worst year of the cholera pandemic, experiencing 23,000 deaths. Because no one knew the origins of the contagion, fear petrified the planet. Snow’s collection of data led to the conclusion that cholera came from the water in a public well pump. His pathbreaking research set alight a bright beam of hope over the darkness of the times. A newly developed science grew out of Snow’s work, saving the lives of millions.[8]

A beneficiary of Snow’s work, Ellen White learned to stare down cholera in the years before the Civil War. When she was in her twenties, a young mother of two sons, the experience in Rochester attracted her fascination with diseases and public health. She read books, pamphlets, magazines, and newspapers on the topic voraciously, escalating her learning as she dealt with the illnesses of her husband, four sons, relatives, and Church members. Several visions helped her grasp the scope of the problem. During the next 40 years, the 1850s-1890s, White’s sermons, pamphlets, and books helped the Adventist community create a message highlighting the importance of health in the Christian life.

In 1890 she published a book titled Christian Temperance and Bible Hygiene, which fleetingly alluded to cholera. White’s comments surfaced as she tried to make clear the significance of personal hygiene in safeguarding the body from illness and disease. She wrote:

“When Lord Palmerston, premier of England, was petitioned by the Scottish clergy to appoint a day of fasting and prayer to avert the cholera, he replied, ‘Cleanse and disinfect your streets and houses, promote cleanliness and health among the poor, and see that they are plentifully supplied with good food and raiment, and employ right sanitary measures generally, and you will have no occasion to fast and pray. Nor will the Lord hear your prayers while these, his preventives, remain unheeded.’”[9]

Ellen White’s usage of Lord Palmerston's response to the Scottish clergy who sought more prayer and fasting highlights the change she experienced during her lifetime concerning pandemics. In the early 1850s, when no one knew the origins or nature of cholera, rebuking cholera and waiting for a miracle became her only resource. But by the end of the century, when science uncovered where cholera came from and how it spread, she counseled members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to take an active role in confronting pandemics. In her opinion, it became the duty of the Christian to fight diseases.

By 1890 White understood pandemics posed a constant threat to the human community, launching terror on humankind since the dawn of history. Since the plague of Athens in 431 B. C.E., that killed 55,000 Athenians, historians have recorded their devastation.[10] The contagions in the United States appear every 38 to 40 years. Not a one-time event that comes and leaves, but rather consistently with us. In the case of cholera, to this day it has not been eradicated. According to the World Health Organization, cholera infects 1.3 to 4 million people every year, killing 21,000 to 143,000.[11] Ellen White’s approach to pandemics matured over the years and revealed a three-phase approach.

First, do not let the pandemic paralyze you, nor sit and wait for a miracle. White believed that fasting and prayer must not replace an effort to understand the disease or to defeat its threat. As Lord Palmerston stressed, the Lord will not hear prayers from those who ignore and disregard preventive action. White’s faith in God continued firm, but she also felt that disregarding preemptive measures posed an even more significant threat.

Second, men and women must live their daily lives as if pandemics sit waiting around the next curve. On September 29, 2005, Dr. Nabarro of the World Health Organization warned, “We expect the next influenza pandemic to come at any time now.”[12] A good Christian, according to Ellen White, must be vigilant and protect his or her immune system. In the first chapter of her book Christian Temperance and Bible Hygiene, she states, “Knowledge must be gained in regards to how to eat and drink and dress so as to preserve health.”[13] For her, good Christians must be well informed and continuously attentive to the developments of the triggers of good health.

Third, Christians must not only know their bodies but also be aware of the world around them. They must think for themselves, and avoid getting caught up in wishful thinking or wallowing in conspiracy theories. In England, some are burning 5G cell towers, and in Mexico attacking health workers. She wrote, “Those who have indulged the habits of racing through exciting stories, are crippling their mental strength, and disqualifying themselves for vigorous thought and research.”[14]

We live in a dangerous time. According to David C. Morrison, in an article published by the Foreign Policy Association, the last pandemic flu, the 1968-69 "Hong Kong" outbreak, killed one million people worldwide, and 34,000 in the United States. The 1957-58 "Asian flu" killed at least twice as many, 70,000 in the U.S. The epochal 1918-19 "Spanish flu" managed to kill off some 50 to 100 million, of whom 500,000 were American.[15]

On March 22, 2020, Pastor Gerald Glenn defiantly announced to his congregation in Chesterfield, Virginia, days after Virginians received an order to avoid large-nonessential gatherings of more than ten people, “I firmly believe that God is larger than this dreaded virus.” Waiting on God to solve the crisis inflicted by the coronavirus became his only course of action. He refused to cancel the worship services of his congregation and believed a miracle would protect him and his parishioners. Today, the pastor is dead, and his wife diagnosed with COVID-19.[16]

Ellen White’s writings and actions revealed a rational and wise approach to a pandemic. She would not have given her blessing to a course of action that disregards the most up-to-date and scientific evidence. Nor would she approve disdain for directives from the most rational evaluations of the day.

Notes & References:

[1] Editors, “Cholera,” HISTORY, accessed April 10, 2020, also Ellen G. White, Early Writings, Battle Creek, Michigan, Review and Herald Publish Association, 1882.

[5] Editors, “Cholera.”

[12] David C. Morrison, “Pandemics and National Security,” Great Decisions, 2006, 93–102.

[15] Morrison, “Pandemics and National Security,” 93.

Ciro Sepulveda, a retired historian (Ph.D. Notre Dame University, 1976), lives with his wife on a farm in Southern, Tennessee. His latest book Ellen G. White: How to Globalize a Movement, reflects a lifetime of interest in the life and times of Ellen G. White. Before his retirement, he chaired the History Department at Oakwood University for twelve years.

Image: The White Family (1864), courtesy of the Ellen G. White Estate.

We invite you to join our community through conversation by commenting below. We ask that you engage in courteous and respectful discourse. You can view our full commenting policy by clicking here.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

Exciting Stories to EGW was in the form of books or articles of a “fictitious character,” which she liken it to “the use of tea—while it stimulates and excites the mind, it gives no real vigor to the mind.” Reading works of fiction or romance makes them “mental dyspeptics, and consequently are unfitted for a responsible position anywhere.” Furthermore many “will never recovered from the effects of intemperate reading… Many have never recovered their original vigor of mind. All attempts to become practical Christians end with the desire. They cannot be truly Christlike, and continue to feed the mind upon this class of literature.” An example EGW used was "Uncle Tom’s Cabin, which she called an “intensely exciting story.”

To follow such advice most SDA’s would have to disconnect from popular moves, works of fiction and computer games.


We train our appetites. Years ago, I used to watch movies on TV. These days, I don’t waste my time on them; they bore me. Novels have no appeal. I prefer biography and real-life accounts.
This article has given me a renewed respect for EGW. She might not have been right about everything, but she showed a desire to learn and supported a commonsense approach. We should do no less.


There isn’t anything inherently “wrong” about reading good novels or movies on TV…what works for one does not work for another. EGW wasn’t correct on this topic.


She definitely avoided those… :rofl:


Yes…it was very HARD to find a good service provider. lol


I bet she would be horrified today. TVs, WiFi, microwaves, dishwashers. And, on top of it, Cell Phones!!! … :wink:


Too many “distractions”…it would have been a world in which Adventism could not have been born into. Can you imagine “EGW in vision” streaming??

1 Like

Well, I bet she would have those visions behind a “:shut door” … :innocent:

But you are right, Adventism would be impossible with the media resources of today. Imagine CNN broadcasting the failed experience on Oct 22, 1844…


Current Adventist Administration has had to cope with instantaneous news around the world. In general, it has not helped them because they cannot “curate” the info like they used to do in their own periodicals. There is a lot of media 24/7 and too many tech savvy people.

Cults do form now but it would be hard to pull off the SDA church in today’s climate. Can you imagine the LDS church getting started now?? :laughing:


I often think of what it would have been like if in the 80s we had the internet, when Des Ford lifted the lid… I remember translating Smuts van Rooyen’s and Ford’s articles, and typing them, them making some 500 copies, and mailing them. In Brazil at that time.
If I only had had the internet… I would have been excommunicated much faster… LOL
@gford1 @Boksburg


It is an interesting thought on how the internet/media that we have now would have impacted that whole scenario in the SDA church. And, yes…the “excommunication” would have gone much faster. :wink:

Isn’t it interesting that even during a pandemic in the year 2020, EGW still needs to be included in the conversation? The entanglement is just astonishing. My parents were already alive during the 1918 pandemic (they were 13 and 8). It never occurred to me to ask, “How did you cope with it?” And what difference would it make anyway?
(Can’t ask them now, there is no Internet provider serving the area where they are now… :roll_eyes:)

1 Like

"Isn’t it interesting that even during a pandemic in the year 2020, EGW still needs to be included in the conversation? "

It is an easy and convenient way to keep her and the “message” alive…and entangled with current events. No, I don’t see that it is necessary at all but it does serve a purpose. :smiley:

"(Can’t ask them now, there is no Internet provider serving the area where they are now… :roll_eyes:)"

That’s a pity… :rofl:

George, look at Des’s FB page. It tells you if you scroll down how to get onto Peter Dixon’s Q and A page. Peter who is a musician is doing interviews with people about Glacier View. Bill Johnsson was the first. John Godfrey and then Norm Young. Very interesting. You should be on the page. You have to join the page, answer three questions and Peter will accept you.


I think anyone from the 19th century would have significant problems coping if they magically found themselves in 2020. Language barrier aside, he or she would adapted far better (or at least faster) to 1st century Rome than she would 21st century Southern CA.


i think you’re right…out-houses were the norm in both the 19th and 1st century, and probably no-one used deodorant…we’re all cooking with push-button microwaves, communicating through push-button screens, and driving great distances in push-button machines we call cars (to say nothing of flying thousands of feet in sit-down machines we call planes over entire oceans until recently)…the last hundred yrs have totally transformed the way people live…

but i don’t think there’d really be an adaptation problem for anyone from any time stepping into the 21st century…anybody can flush a toilet, microwave a meal, and relax in a jacuzzi at the push of a button…the real coping problem would be taking someone from 21 century CA and putting him into 1st century rome, or even 19th century CA…i can see major stress, and maybe even mental breakdowns, happening…


DavidJ…Do you read historical fiction?

“Even fiction which contains no suggestion of impurity, and which may be intended to teach excellent principles, is harmful. It encourages the habit of hasty and superficial reading, merely for the story. Thus it tends to destroy the power of connected and vigorous thought; it unfits the soul to contemplate the great problems of duty and destiny.” EGW

“The readers of fiction are indulging an evil that destroys spirituality, eclipsing the beauty of the sacred page. It creates an unhealthy excitement, fevers the imagination, unfits the mind for usefulness, weans the soul from prayer, and disqualifies it for any spiritual exercise.” EGW

I trust no SDA pastor or church leader reads or watches works of fiction.


LOL! Yeah, people are losing their minds because certain activities are limited during the COVID restrictions. Take away the electronic toys on top of it all…well, that would make for a great study.


Lead scientist are leaning towards EGW principles