Martin King's Letter to White Clergy - A Message for All Ages

It is Martin Luther King, Jr. Day in the United States today. As the country continues to struggle to eradicate its endemic racism, the words of Dr. King still cut to the heart of the national discourse as they did during his all-too-short lifetime. The time that has passed without the realization of his Dream has only served to amplify what King called "the fierce urgency of now."

In April of 1963, Martin King intentionally violated an anti-protesting ordinance in Birmingham, Alabama, and was jailed on Good Friday. During his incarceration, Dr. King wrote his indelible "Letter From a Birmingham Jail" with a stubby pencil on the margins of a newspaper. He addressed the letter to eight white Alabama pastors who opposed his civil rights protest.

Though addressing circumstances present in the American South of the 1960's, King's letter could just as easily have been written to the white church of today. The Civil Rights Movement of the 1960's is today's Black Lives Matter movement, and King's statement in the letter, "I am in Birmingham because injustice is here," is as timely a clarion call as ever—a call to fight injustice wherever it appears. Below is an excerpt from Martin King's letter—a reminder of what he struggled and died for. -Editor

There was a time when the church was very powerful—in the time when the early Christians rejoiced at being deemed worthy to suffer for what they believed. In those days the church was not merely a thermometer that recorded the ideas and principles of popular opinion; it was a thermostat that transformed the mores of society. Whenever the early Christians entered a town, the people in power became disturbed and immediately sought to convict the Christians for being "disturbers of the peace" and "outside agitators."' But the Christians pressed on, in the conviction that they were "a colony of heaven," called to obey God rather than man. Small in number, they were big in commitment. They were too God-intoxicated to be "astronomically intimidated." By their effort and example they brought an end to such ancient evils as infanticide and gladiatorial contests. Things are different now. So often the contemporary church is a weak, ineffectual voice with an uncertain sound. So often it is an archdefender of the status quo. Far from being disturbed by the presence of the church, the power structure of the average community is consoled by the church's silent—and often even vocal—sanction of things as they are.

But the judgment of God is upon the church as never before. If today's church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authenticity, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twentieth century. Every day I meet young people whose disappointment with the church has turned into outright disgust.

Perhaps I have once again been too optimistic. Is organized religion too inextricably bound to the status quo to save our nation and the world? Perhaps I must turn my faith to the inner spiritual church, the church within the church, as the true ekklesia and the hope of the world. But again I am thankful to God that some noble souls from the ranks of organized religion have broken loose from the paralyzing chains of conformity and joined us as active partners in the struggle for freedom. They have left their secure congregations and walked the streets of Albany, Georgia, with us. They have gone down the highways of the South on tortuous rides for freedom. Yes, they have gone to jail with us. Some have been dismissed from their churches, have lost the support of their bishops and fellow ministers. But they have acted in the faith that right defeated is stronger than evil triumphant. Their witness has been the spiritual salt that has preserved the true meaning of the gospel in these troubled times. They have carved a tunnel of hope through the dark mountain of disappointment. I hope the church as a whole will meet the challenge of this decisive hour. But even if the church does not come to the aid of justice, I have no despair about the future. I have no fear about the outcome of our struggle in Birmingham, even if our motives are at present misunderstood. We will reach the goal of freedom in Birmingham and all over the nation, because the goal of America is freedom. Abused and scorned though we may be, our destiny is tied up with America's destiny. Before the pilgrims landed at Plymouth, we were here. Before the pen of Jefferson etched the majestic words of the Declaration of Independence across the pages of history, we were here. For more than two centuries our forebears labored in this country without wages; they made cotton king; they built the homes of their masters while suffering gross injustice and shameful humiliation—and yet out of a bottomless vitality they continued to thrive and develop. If the inexpressible cruelties of slavery could not stop us, the opposition we now face will surely fail. We will win our freedom because the sacred heritage of our nation and the eternal will of God are embodied in our echoing demands. Before closing I feel impelled to mention one other point in your statement that has troubled me profoundly. You warmly commended the Birmingham police force for keeping "order" and "preventing violence." I doubt that you would have so warmly commended the police force if you had seen its dogs sinking their teeth into unarmed, nonviolent Negroes. I doubt that you would so quickly commend the policemen if you were to observe their ugly and inhumane treatment of Negroes here in the city jail; if you were to watch them push and curse old Negro women and young Negro girls; if you were to see them slap and kick old Negro men and young boys; if you were to observe them, as they did on two occasions, refuse to give us food because we wanted to sing our grace together. I cannot join you in your praise of the Birmingham police department.

It is true that the police have exercised a degree of discipline in handling the demonstrators. In this sense they have conducted themselves rather "nonviolently" in public. But for what purpose? To preserve the evil system of segregation. Over the past few years I have consistently preached that nonviolence demands that the means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek. I have tried to make clear that it is wrong to use immoral means to attain moral ends. But now I must affirm that it is just as wrong, or perhaps even more so, to use moral means to preserve immoral ends. Perhaps Mr. Connor and his policemen have been rather nonviolent in public, as was Chief Pritchett in Albany, Georgia, but they have used the moral means of nonviolence to maintain the immoral end of racial injustice. As T. S. Eliot has said: "The last temptation is the greatest treason: To do the right deed for the wrong reason."

I wish you had commended the Negro sit inners and demonstrators of Birmingham for their sublime courage, their willingness to suffer and their amazing discipline in the midst of great provocation. One day the South will recognize its real heroes. They will be the James Merediths, with the noble sense of purpose that enables them to face jeering and hostile mobs, and with the agonizing loneliness that characterizes the life of the pioneer. They will be old, oppressed, battered Negro women, symbolized in a seventy two year old woman in Montgomery, Alabama, who rose up with a sense of dignity and with her people decided not to ride segregated buses, and who responded with ungrammatical profundity to one who inquired about her weariness: "My feets is tired, but my soul is at rest." They will be the young high school and college students, the young ministers of the gospel and a host of their elders, courageously and nonviolently sitting in at lunch counters and willingly going to jail for conscience' sake. One day the South will know that when these disinherited children of God sat down at lunch counters, they were in reality standing up for what is best in the American dream and for the most sacred values in our Judaeo Christian heritage, thereby bringing our nation back to those great wells of democracy which were dug deep by the founding fathers in their formulation of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

Read the full text of Dr. King's Letter From a Birmingham Jail HERE.

If you respond to this article, please:

Make sure your comments are germane to the topic; be concise in your reply; demonstrate respect for people and ideas whether you agree or disagree with them; and limit yourself to one comment per article, unless the author of the article directly engages you in further conversation. Comments that meet these criteria are welcome on the Spectrum Website. Comments that fail to meet these criteria will be removed.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

Was this written fifty years ago or just this morning? This is an amazing and relevant message. Thanks for posting it.


This “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” stands proudly alongside the Declaration of Independence, The Gettysburg Address and several other speeches/documents as one of the finest in American History, according to some historians I read. And I do not disagree. To think it was crafted from a jail cell without mountains of books and articles to consult, that it came from a mind and a heart both well-educated and impassioned by African-American suffering, no more noble summons for change in the church can be imagined. It is hard to deny that he was born to do anything other than expose our prejudices to the light of the gospel. The further away we get from him in time, the larger he becomes in memory!!


How many persons does The Church just TOLERATE in our society communities.
How many persons does the SDA church just TOLERATE in it’s communities.
TOLERATE is not Welcoming, Tolerate is NOT allowing to participate in ALL the “church”.
Does The Church of The End Time still disappoint Young AND Old and cause them to turn away from it?
Cause them to HAVE to find and worship God outside of The SDA Church?

Every year the Southern States churches of the Episcopalian Church makes a pilgrimage to Haynesville, ALA. It remembers a white seminarian from Boston who was shot in cold blood in front of a grocery store by the store owner when a group wanted to purchase some soft drinks. He was REALLY intending to murder a young teen age girl. But the White person stepped in front just as the shot gun blast went off. He walked to the sheriff’s office and reported what he had done. He was given a verdict of NOT GUILTY by an all white jury, saying the persons were Trespassing. Therefore the store owner had a RIGHT to shoot Trespassers.
A lot of the blacks were later put into jail. Many persons per cell. The commodes didnot work. The jailers cut the water off. Black men downstairs, Black women up stairs. They were there for 3 days. Little food, minimal water, if any. No toilet facilities for 3 days.
Other Blacks in that town were shot, left by the side of the road to be eaten by wild animals. Just because they were “too prosperous”. Owned a business, and one owned 3 business. This was the middle and late 50’s.
These White folk were church going people. Christians, many of them.

What is the SDA church folk doing for the marginalized of the communities. Has the SDA church, without consulting God, placed certain groups of people in the community in the Undesirable section? DO NOT INVITE to an SDA church Section?
This Letter From The Birmingham Jail is read EACH year in the gathering of hundreds of persons – black and white – in the Haynesville, AL court house, where the NOT GUILTY verdict was read.
In some ways it is STILL a prophetic Message to the Church. Perhaps even the Seventh day Adventist church.
May we take it PERSONAL, and not for others.


I have often wondered how different would the outcome be if there had been a Martin Luther King spokesmen in the mid 1800’s for Native Americans. Where were religious leaders during the “Trail of Tears” of forced relocation of Native American nations in the United States following the Indian Removal Act of 1830? The same could be said about early Chinese immigrants in San Francisco who were viewed as an inferior and undesirable population,

Where is the voice of our leaders in support of North African and Muslim migrants?


In choosing to stay out of such travesties the church has lost its moral authority to be a light to the world. Now Pope Francis has taken the position of moral leader that the Protestant Churches largely abandoned.


This is powerful to see something like this in writing. My understood search from a white friend skin color of pearl search his ancestry generational family tree found him with black beginning to slave trade black history of protest and anguish. This protest and anguish is not “new” news. They are heritage anger of slavery of 1861 to the conventional 21st Century continuing to protest and anguish as cast-off or captured that never run dry by whites with color of pearl but in their hearts of ignorant beginning steady black blood running in their bloodstream.