Our Moment at Jabbok


(Spectrumbot) #1

When you are through with your tradition, it must be different from what you found or else you have failed. It is your responsibility to make your religious tradition, whatever it may be, Christian or otherwise, more truly religious by the time you are through with it. That’s the great challenge we face. —Brother David Steindl-Rast, “The Shadow in Christianity”

In story and in myth, crossing rivers signals a shift of identity, the overcoming of not only a natural force but of a personal barrier to a new experience. In Greek mythology the River Styx is the boundary between life and death. In Norse mythology the Ifing River separates Asgard, the land of the gods, from Jotunheim, the land of the giants. It runs so swiftly that ice can never form on it, and thus it is an effective barrier for any giant who wants to take on the gods. The Jabbok River, a tributary of the Jordan River, is the place where Jacob wrestles with God before he meets his estranged brother for the first time in years.

Jacob sent his family, his household, and all his possessions over the river before the sun went down, but now in the darkness he is alone. Scripture can be so stringently laconic at times: the text in Genesis 32 simply says, “Jacob was left alone; and a man wrestled with him until daybreak.”

Spiritually, Jacob is at a crossroads in his life. Even within the womb he struggled to gain an advantage, but Esau emerged first. Esau had the brawn; Jacob had the guile. What he couldn’t get through honest effort, he gained through deception. But he had his comeuppances, too. The blessing he had stolen from his brother as he deceived his father curdled in his heart: his beautiful bride, Rachel, was found instead — on his wedding night, no less — to be her stolid and morose sister, Leah. His servitude to his father-in-law, Laban, a man renowned for his chicanery, stretched on year after year. Jacob survived through cleverness, bordering on fraud.

He had his moments of light though. Making his way through the desert, he lay one night under the stars and dreamed he saw a ladder stretching to the heavens, alive and glowing with angels, stunning in their beauty and haughtiness. When he awoke, gasping and disoriented, all he could whisper across the sands was, “Surely the Lord is in this place — and I did not know it! How awesome is this place! This is the house of God and this is the gate of heaven.” And so he called it Beth El.

But this night he is alone with his anxieties, a man approaching middle age who carries responsibility for an extended family, slaves, and herds. Jewish philosopher Martin Buber saw in Jacob the existential man, wrestling with life’s questions until he wins through to some spiritual release.

Psychologically speaking, we can see Jacob struggling with his Shadow, the part of himself that he could not acknowledge, that constantly raised its head to confront him with his weakness, his suspicion, his fear, and the ache in his heart that pounded into him with every breath that he would never be good enough for his father.

In Carl Jung’s development of the Shadow it appears in our dreams as a figure of the same sex as ourselves whom we fear or dislike or regard as inferior. In trying to live up to the standards of conduct set for us by parents, church, and society, we identify with those ego ideals and reject the qualities that contradict them. “But the rejected qualities do not cease to exist,” says John Sanford in Evil: The Shadow Side of Reality, “simply because they have been denied direct expression. Instead they live on within us and form the secondary personality that psychology calls the Shadow (50).”

Unless we recognize them and integrate them into our consciousness, they will only cause us pain and confound our psychological and spiritual growth. But the shadow personality can also be a positive force for us if we can relate to it in the correct way. If we have always repressed anger in an attempt to be kind and “Christian,” it becomes part of our shadow. But if we can integrate part of that capacity for anger it can help us become stronger, more resolute people, who are able to respond in a healthier way to intolerable circumstances and especially to injustice. Sanford offers the example of Jesus’ anger in driving out the money changers who were profaning the Temple of God. “Obviously, Jesus’ capacity for controlled anger gave his personality a strength that he would not have had had he lacked the capacity for such a response,” notes Sanford.

People in whom the Shadow is repressed often lack a sense of humor. They are not able to see themselves as anything but striving for perfection — and humor is often a release for all the tension that comes from falling short — and from falling. If we can have humility without humiliation, then we can laugh at ourselves in those awkward situations. The Shadow helps us forgive ourselves and others, too.

Jacob at Jabbok is one of those stories that stays with one throughout a lifetime. It is about a man being reborn through struggle and suffering, who wins through failing, and who limps off into the sunrise a hero. He had been passive-aggressive all his life, looking for an advantage where he could not prevail through strength or credibility. Now, as he struggles through the night, he puts his whole heart into it, assertive, not violent — so alive for the first time that the superior strength of his opponent is his joyous challenge. Even as the Stranger strikes his hip, throwing it out of joint, Jacob will not let him go without a blessing.

The audacity of one who sees his spiritual liberation within his grasp is stunning. And in that moment his name, Jacob, “The Supplanter,” is flung away, and a new name, Israel, “The God-Striver,” pours down on him like oil. As the first light strikes the mountain tops in the distance, the Stranger slips out of Jacob’s sobbing grasp, lowering him to the ground.

When he rolls over and looks around, he is alone again. Once, he had seen the angels; now, with a thrill of awe, he struggles to his feet: “I have seen God face to face and lived!”

***

The ability to admit one is wrong and to change one’s ways and direction is part of the toolkit for any Christian. Lord knows we get enough practice at it to be experts, but it’s a lesson we apparently must learn and relearn. As individuals, we may stop in our tracks, look back, see where we diverged, and change course. As institutions? Not so much.

It takes humility to admit that we are wrong; it takes perception to see it. To perceive is to see our situation with new eyes: that we may be right in our results, but wrong in how we got them; that we may have magnified the incidentals and overlooked the essentials; that we may have gotten some of it right — but there’s so much more to discover.

Jacob struggling at the River Jabbok is a metaphor. Facing his greatest crisis, he bares his soul like an offering. The struggle is not about winning, but about dying and being reborn. Jacob struggles against himself that his true self might emerge. He bears in his flesh the wound that never heals, every step the ache of Love’s weight. From now on, Jacob’s empathy for those frozen in their pride draws them to him; he becomes a warming, healing presence to those whose self-righteousness wedges them apart from others.

***

This is our Jabbok moment as a church. As we confront our hubris and our guile we may finally acknowledge our shadow. “True justice must resolve a conflict in a way that leaves the community whole,” writes Paul Woodruff in The Ajax Dilemma. “It’s not merely what you decide that matters, but how you decide it, and how you communicate the decision.” We have thought of ourselves as templates for perfection, nothing short of a model for the world. But we are humans, fretful in our weaknesses, and yet bright with promise. If, as a church, we struggle now for a rebirth, we will hear God’s breath close to us. “I never asked for perfection,” God will say, “only that you become complete. And I will take care of that.”

Our changes now are painful, extended in time, bending our form to the breaking point. That is how change is made in this dimension of time and space. On this plane our changes usually cause friction and disturb the peace. There is a time coming when we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, as we are transformed from the perishable to the imperishable.

Barry Casey taught religion, philosophy, and communications for 28 years at Columbia Union College, now Washington Adventist University, and business communication at Stevenson University for 7 years. He continues as adjunct professor in ethics and philosophy at Trinity Washington University, D.C. More of the author’s writing can be found on his blog, Dante’s Woods.

Image Credit: Unsplash / Ian Espinosa

We invite you to join our community through conversation by commenting below. We ask that you engage in courteous and respectful discourse. You can view our full commenting policy by clicking here.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at http://spectrummagazine.org/node/9086

(William Noel) #2

Barry, once again you have spoken in riddles and theoretical threads of thought that have left me struggling to figure out how to apply them in a practical way.


(Barry Casey) #3

Sorry, I don’t mean to be a Riddler! The essay is meant to suggest that our fears (the Shadow), like Jacob’s fears, precipitate a crisis of faith. If we don’t side-step it and if we struggle to face God’s grace we can be reborn. It’s also a plea for the church, at this Annual Council, to come to terms with its mistakes and find a new spiritual identity, like Jacob did.


(William Noel) #4

Thank you for the quick response. Please be more plain-spoken. Jesus spoke plainly using parables that the common people could understand instead of the complex philosophy of the Pharisees.


#5

So we do not lose heart. Even though our outer nature is wasting away, our inner nature is being renewed day by day. For this slight momentary affliction is preparing us for an eternal weight of glory beyond all measure… —2 Cor 4:16-17 NRSV


(Steve Mga) #6

Barry –
Liked your essay on Jacob at Jabbok. He had a lot to think about that night. Physically
wrestling probably encouraged improved, stronger thought processes as he thought
about the 40+ years since his birth and the many “tricky” events that happened.
He was finally able to make up with Esau.
Esau was finally able to have some type of closure.
Isaac was still alive and was able to have some type of closure with him.
But his 14+ years at Laban’s had an effect on the kids that never got erased.

He and Esau had so much to talk about!

At the River at Daybreak, he FINALLY received the True Blessing, not the blessing
he thought he was seeking at the hand of Isaac so many years previously.


(Sam Geli) #7

Barry, your essay was timely and eloquent! True learning takes place when there is a change in behavior. Our Moment at Jabbok is now! How clear do we need to be to be heard by our leaders?


(Barry Casey) #8

Right, the blessing he received was truly his this time.


(George Tichy) #9

Prediction: This is not going to happen.

The agenda for the AC is in place. The only hope is for those representing the real SDAC to vote down those propositions that violate decency, honesty. and morality.


(George Tichy) #10

This is what the Church will experience when a new crew is voted in to replace the current administration. Until then, the saga will continue as is.

Also, it is my opinion that the pastors working in the offices the GC, Divisions, Unions, and Conferences should be younger, probably not older than 60. Thus, if they do a bad job, they can still be sent to pastoring a church - as punishment for incompetence. If they are older, they can wreck the boat without experiencing any “grave consequences.”

Crazy idea? Just think of the motivation this would generate. “No re-election buddy, you are going back to preaching now.” :thinking::thinking::thinking:


(George Tichy) #11

Good luck! Their agenda does not include this kind of things.


(Thomas J Zwemer) #12

But Adventism stole the birthright from Jesus, Them made Him just like us so we could become just like Him. If Ted looks like Christ then he needs something more than a bad hip.


(Kim Green) #13

***When you are through with your tradition, it must be different from what you found or else you have failed. It is your responsibility to make your religious tradition, whatever it may be, Christian or otherwise, more truly religious by the time you are through with it. That’s the great challenge we face.***

Magnificent quote, Barry! I am wondering if “more truly religious” could/should mean more “spiritual”?


(Herold Weiss) #14

This wonderful essay was not written in riddles. It is as clear as it could possibly be. That the GC administrators need to face their “shadow” and in the process gain a new perspective of the world in which they are called to be leaders is abundantly clear. Like George Tichy, however, I think that they are not on the way to a meeting with Esau. They see themselves already enjoying life in the Promise Land, with nothing to fear. Can anyone be under a greater deception?


(Kim Green) #15

The figurative is literal in this essay…abundantly clear as to how and why it directly correlates to the Adventist church now.

No deception is greater than self- deception. That is where true deception starts.


(Cfowler) #16

Wow! I’ve not thought of the view of Jesus being born with sinful flesh in quite this way before. I never did believe this view, and came to see how heretical it is. Well put, Tom.


(Robert Lindbeck) #17

In some conferences, the only full time administrators are the president and the ministerial secretary (& possibly a few more). Many of the departmental leaders are part time and either fill in across multiple departments or are splict between the conference and a church. It would keep the administrators grounded if they had to care for a local church as well their admin functions.


(Barry Casey) #18

Probably so, Kim. But when Brother Steindl-Rast wrote that passage the word “spiritual” was not as commonly substituted for “religious/religion” as it is now.


(Barry Casey) #19

Actually, Jesus had to explain the parables to his disciples many times. While his teachings might be “plain,” they are also complex and multi-layered.


(Kim Green) #20

Yes, this why I commented on it.