Part 1: Genesis—From Rest to Unrest

We all know that one of the many promises God has made to us is the promise of rest. Matthew 11:28–29 is a well-known and clear articulation of that promise.

Come to Me all those laboring and being burdened, and I will give you rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, because I am meek and lowly in heart and you will find rest to your souls. For My yoke is easy and My burden is light (Matthew 11:28–29*).

As with many of the most important concepts in the Bible, this rest is first described in Genesis, chapters 1–11.

On the seventh day God completed His work which He had made, and He rested on the seventh day from all the work which He had made. And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because He rested from all His work on it, which God had created to make (Genesis 2:2–3).

However, often when we think about Genesis, chapters 1–11, we don’t think in terms of rest. Rather, it is in terms of creation—long or short, my interpretation or yours. This is unfortunate, because rest is the main point. In creating, God took something “without form, and void,” something in an unorganized state, ordering it, and bringing life to it through His Word. And then came rest, a rest described in terms of unity in relationship—naked and not ashamed.

So, what does the beginning of the Bible tell us about rest? At least two things are important to note from Genesis 2:1–3, specifically. First, sanctification takes place because God rested. The second is that this “day” of rest was not supposed to end. There is no evening and morning listed at the end of the seventh day (see Gen. 2:3). Rather, the day (the good, resting, trusting-relationship-with-God, naked-and-unashamed day) ends in Genesis 3 when the man and woman decide not to trust God, and they eat the fruit.

The entire Bible, from beginning to end, from Genesis to Revelation, is a story about God trying to bring back this state of rest, in which people are in His presence, naked and unashamed. An important indication of His intention is found just a few chapters later, at the end of Genesis 5, where, in the tenth generation from Adam, in the line that carries “the Seed” (Genesis 3:15), Noah is introduced. Noah, the man who typifies Christ by providing a place of refuge for mankind during the flood and placing them back in a newly recreated earth—his name means “rest.”

Rest continues to be an important theme throughout the Bible. And it is not isolated to the seventh-day Sabbath as testament to creation, or even to the Sabbaths of the seventh and jubilee years, when the land and the oppressed are given rest. It is also especially prominent in other contexts we know to be “shadows” of the earth made new. For example, rest is an important theme when the Israelites are crossing the Jordan into Canaan (e.g. Deut. 12:9–10. Deut. 25:19 compared with Deut. 28:64–65, Josh. 1:13–15, 21:4–22:4, and Josh. 23) and in the establishment of the feast of Purim after the final battle between the Jews and the followers of Haman (Esther 9). Rest is also something that happens when good judges and kings are ruling [e.g. Judges 3:11 (Othneil), 3:30 (Ehud), 5:31 (Deborah), 2 Sam 7 (David), Solomon (1 King 5:4 & 1 Chron. 22:9)]. There is also concern for the Ark of the Covenant’s rest (1 Chron. 28:2, along with the David–Solomon comparison)].

Rest is an important theme because, as we have shown, we broke God’s rest and He is in the process of restoring it, and our world. And like Jesus’ invitation in the Beatitudes (Matt. 5), Hebrews 4 is another explicit reminder of this promise of rest. However, all these “shadows” or “types” point to the true rest (the good, resting, trusting relationship with God, naked and unashamed), which is depicted not just in the second chapter of the Bible (Genesis 2) but also evoked in the second to last chapter (Rev. 21), where, in the most hope-inspiring passage of the Bible, John writes,

And I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and the sea no longer is. And I John saw the holy city, New Jerusalem coming down out of Heaven from God, having been prepared as a bride, having been adorned for her Husband. And I heard a great voice out of Heaven, saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God with men! And He will tabernacle with them, and they will be His people, and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes. And death shall be no longer, for the first things passed away. And behold I make all things new. And He says to me, write, because these words are faithful and true (Revelation 21:1–4).

Man’s Unrest: Naked and Ashamed

While all of this talk of rest is quite familiar to most Christians, what we fear is less well appreciated: the notion of “unrest.” For too many of us, we think only about the unrest of war, injustice, and the behaviors that go against our own sensibilities. There is no question that these are fruits of unrest, but they are not the unrest—simply a result of it. Instead, the Bible describes unrest as being rooted entirely in our own attempts to take control of our lives rather than seeing ourselves for what we are and not trusting God to accept us (broken trust). One way the Bible depicts these conditions is through how we are dressed.

As stated earlier, God’s rest is depicted at the end of the first creation story, and initially mankind shared in this rest, which is depicted at the end of the second telling of the story.

And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and they were not ashamed (Genesis 2:25).

At this point, rest is associated with no shame. No shame because, even though we are naked and helpless, there is no thought in our minds of falling short. Rather, we are resting in God’s hands, making no attempt to change our condition.

As we know, relational rest is lost in Genesis 3, when, for the first time, mankind imagines themselves apart from God. Distrust (friction) has entered the relationship, and from then on, the inevitable halting of the machine begins, followed shortly by the first act of trying to save (fix) ourselves—we sew garments from vegetation to cover our nakedness and our shame.

And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked. And they sewed leaves of the fig-tree and made girdles for themselves (Genesis 3:7) . . . And he said, I have heard Your sound in the garden, and I was afraid, for I am naked, and I hid myself (Genesis 3:10).

Notice that our condition had not changed—we are still naked and helpless. However, our understanding of our condition had. And because of this, our relationship with God and each other went from being one of dependence to one of masks and pretense. So, in our first act in sin, we attempt to change our own condition—from nakedness to clothed. Yet, this does not bring rest. Rather, it perpetuates the cycle of unrest—always needing to protect ourselves and convince ourselves and others that we are in control of life. Yet, in an early promise of hope, God removes our handmade clothes, covering us with the skins of another—skins we have had no hand in making (Genesis 3:21).

These ideas of “doing it ourselves” or “trusting in God” continue to be a focal point throughout Genesis 1–11, as well as the rest of the Bible. In fact, the structure of the next eight chapters is designed specifically to compare these two alternatives. And the imagery of clothing becomes a powerful metaphor running through to Revelation and the world made new.

Let us rejoice and let us exult, and we will give glory to Him, because the marriage of the Lamb came, and his wife prepared herself. And it was given her that she be clothed in fine linen, pure and bright: for the fine linen is the righteousness of the saints (Revelation 19:7–8).

Now, in some translations this passage suggests a conundrum. Does the bride really prepare herself through her righteous acts? Reading the passage this way definitely fits with the works-based theology that the devil wants to perpetuate among God’s children. However, what we find particularly fascinating about this final set of clothes is how perfectly their description captures the restoration process God is working on, and how it helps combat false notions of the blending of grace and works. In our initial, pre-fall state, we are naked—everyone sees us for who we are—and we are unashamed. However, after sin, we are depicted as wearing one of two types of clothing—fig leaves, a harvestable crop, representing our own works, or animal skins, representing being covered by another’s life.

One way of reconciling these two coverings is by blending them. For example, man does his best and God makes up the difference. However, Leviticus 19:19 forbids the blending of these two opposed forms of coverings. Rather, in the world made new, we are depicted as wearing fine linen, which, like fig leaves is a garment made from fruits of the field. Yet, like animal skins, this is a garment given to us. So, unlike a blended garment that symbolizes grace mixed with a bit of good old-fashioned self-control, the clothing we as the bride are wearing is an indication of our righteousness—the new heart created by God in us (Psalm 51). No longer are we covered by the skins of another and no longer are we ashamed.

(This theme continues with next week’s lesson.)

*All texts quoted from the Interlinear Bible: Hebrew/Greek/English, translated by Jay P. Green, 1987 edition; all bold-face type supplied by authors.

JEB Beagles, PhD, is assistant professor of International Non-Profit Management and Finance at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School. He is happy to be Rachel’s husband and Coen’s father. Kathy Beagles Coneff, his mother, is a retired religious educator and editor. She continues to use those skills doing contract work with NAD Youth and Young Adult Ministries and others.

Photo by Max Andrey from Pexels

We invite you to join our community through conversation by commenting below. We ask that you engage in courteous and respectful discourse. You can view our full commenting policy by clicking here.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at http://spectrummagazine.org/node/10450

We have changed the Sabbath into a day of going to church, potlucks, hikes, etc. Not a day of rest. No version of the 4th commandment talks about going to church. But then, there are a lot of myths about the creation story that even well-read Christians keep touting. https://the-undercover-adventist.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-myth-of-creation.html

2 Likes

There’s a reason the Jews ended chapter one at the end of the sixth day. The sixth day was the last creation day. The seventh day of the narrative is God’s first day of not creating: He spent the day not creating. He rested from creating on the seventh day and on the eighth day, ad infinitum. By now the hearers of this story will realize that the components of each day are the same as the first day.

First God created light, then He arranged for half-day pauses within the light, then He named the light “day”, then He named the pauses “night”.

By this time, He had finished the first days creating. After that, God waited for the day to end and night to pass. The KJV translation’s, “The evening and the morning were the first day” has misled millions. The NIV’s “There was evening (sunset), and there was morning (sunrise)” got it right. Neither case described God’s workday; they described the downtime AFTER each day’s creative miracles were accomplished. I recently read a Jewish historian’s assurance that Israel picked up evening-to-evening reckoning while in Babylonian captivity. Some priests remained faithful to Genesis 1 until the temple was destroyed.

I just read a new translation of the Tanakh that says that God finished His work on the sixth day and rested from it on the “following day” (instead of the “seventh day”) which was the first day that He rested from creating. He immediately honored that single day in history. No mention of a sabbath yet. No mention that Adam and Eve rested. From what? They hadn’t done any work yet. Of course God’s rest continued on the eighth day and the ninth day, etc. He evidently singled out the seventh day because it was the first day of His rest. No mention of God resuming the work of creating on the eighth day, or the ninth day, etc., so He rested just as much othose days, but He only honored that one day–it says “day”, singular.

Our pioneers assumed that the words, “the seventh day” meant the “seventh day of the calendar week”, although Bible Hebrew doesn’t even have a calendar week. Evidently then, the commandment told them that whenever they worked six consecutive days, they and their slaves must take a day off and honor that rest as a sabbath of Yahweh! (From dawn to dawn.)

1 Like

This is such a refreshing and wonderful essay. The authors articulate the concept of ‘rest’ within the meaning of righteousness by faith, which is artfully explanatory…even to the extent of properly interpreting Rev. 19:7-8 which is the capstone of the sanctification process. This verse does not represent Jesus’ righteousness…as the authors state, the white linen is the ‘deeds of the saints’…deeds which they did not accomplish as works, but as the natural outcome of being connected to the Branch.

After the lesson quarterly’s frequent allusions to ‘read the bible and obey’…a behavioral and totally wrong approach to salvation, these authors offer a direct contrast. If we can finally grasp the concept of ‘resting in Jesus’, He will do the work of sanctification in our lives.

4 Likes

Thank you for those refreshing thoughts.

Here in Scotland we are still in COVID-19 lockdown. And that makes Sabbath a very different day. It’s no longer a…

…and has turned into a proper day of rest. Long walks with the dog, Zoom Sabbath School classes where dressing is optional(!), and lots and lots of reading. I have to confess that I’m rather enjoying this.

Will conventional Adventist sabbath-keeping remain untouched by all this?

(I do miss potluck lunches, though…)

2 Likes

I love this way of reading for truth “hidden” in the stories. I sense, as an oral tradition, stories were the vehicle of truth. We’ve sometimes turned it into flashcards and recipe books with “literal” plain (plane-ie flat dimensional) reading.

I imagine the futility of Adams figged up knickers lacked sartorial finesse but may have had some initial guilt-salving utility- but I wonder about the “shame” having sexual connotations ascribed to it.
You quote the book of beginnings and the never ending end book, but what of the heart book, smack in the middle? Song of Solomon as a wedding night-between the honeymoon garden sabbath and the everlasting ketubah suggests a clean and warm boudoir floor is as important as slippers for the bride, recalcitrant to rise to the door barefoot and thus misses her groom.

Note that another parallel story arises-Adam fled from the tree and tried to cover himself-but the “elder brother” Adam came to the tree naked.

Looking forward to the next piece.

2 Likes

This topic was automatically closed after 7 days. New replies are no longer allowed.