Perspective: What Will Africans Do With Women's Ordination?

(Spectrumbot) #1

In the ongoing discussion about women's ordination in the Seventh-day Adventist Church, many have feared the possible disintegration of churches from the third-world nations—Africa in particular—should women's ordination be accepted. Most conceive of the African sociological set up as a male-dominated society.  I will say that such affirmations are false. A majority of Africans' reasons for objecting to women's ordination is common to everyone else, irrespective of where one may be. In this article, I will attempt to shed some light on Africans' sociology of gender, which is mostly misunderstood by the West. I will also outline few circumstances that have shaped Africans' thoughts on women's ordination, which makes their objection to the issue more theological than cultural.

Africa’s Sociology of Gender
Though there are intricate social and political role differences between women and men in African societies, men and women live peacefully. The harmony is so beautiful that it pervades all African traditional ceremonies such as funerals and festivals. Men exercise great authority and power in the homes. Women, likewise, exercise great authority and power over their children, and in matters relating to the political institutions, which is kingship in most African societies. The idea of male dominance and women's subjugation as inferiors never entered the African consciousness until Western ideologies infiltrated the social and political institutions. Until the arrival of feminism, men understood their societal roles, and women knew their societal roles. Role-sharing was naturally demarcated. There is an Akan proverbs that says: “When a woman buys a gun, she keeps it in a man’s room,” meaning women don’t use guns, for instance.

Authority and power may have some slight differences in meaning. Authority is one’s right to exercise power. Whereas power is one’s capacity to exercise authority. Both authority and power are arbitrary in African societies. Men have authority and power when it comes to the execution of their masculine roles such as hunting, war, kingship, family affairs etc. Women too have their authority and power in matriarchal contexts—kinship, child education, enstoolment (installing) of kingship, etc. 

The authority and power of men arises as a result of the social and political stratification of responsibilities within African societies. It is the man who creates wealth for the entire family. The married woman, whose role as a wife, leans upon the husband for protection and providence. Traditionally, the wife hopes for two things in marriage: children and wealth. In some matriarchal societies, the children have blood affiliation to the mother’s clan. Therefore, the children belong to the woman. Though many African women do work tirelessly, their work is more of daily subsistence. In cases where the man’s effort is insufficient, the woman works to support the family. A man’s authority in the matrimony must not be confused with men’s authority towards other women in the society. Their authority as men is thus recognized as respect, and this is gender mutuality.

Politically, men are the opinion leaders. In many African societies, kingship is masculine. Yet a king does not rule alone. He rules with a queen mother. Men and women jointly rule society. In some communities, the queen mother exerts great influence—more than the king, for example, among the Akans of Ghana and Ethiopia. In Akan tradition, it is the queen mother who has the absolute power to legitimate one’s right to the throne. She has power to enstool and destool a king. Her opinion is final. Without her consent, no one can install a king to office. The queen mother’s office protects and ensures women’s equity and justice.

Queenship was the traditional feminist’s voice.
The idea of authority and power in African communities is not masculine absolute. Women play their roles as well as men. Though men fulfill many social and political responsibilities, their authority and power are exceeded as a result of their many roles rather than their gender. In the African context, authority and power exist in roles and responsibilities. Men’s authority is not over women alone, it is over men as well. A male child who is unmarried or married, irrespective of his age, still comes under the authority of his mother. What we often witness as male authoritarianism must be seen as an abuse of traditional values.

Looking at this background, Africa’s objection to women's ordination cannot be attributed to sociological reasons. In my own observation of the various arguments among Africans, the issue is far advanced from sociological contexst. The few who dare to make it a contextual issue do not say so loudly since such positions are subjective and would be branded misogynistic.

So what have been some Africans’ problem concerning women's ordination? Before outlining possible problems, I would like to point it out that the objection to women ordination in Africa has not been a talk of men alone. Many women, for many reasons, object to women's ordination, while others are never convinced of any biblical explanations for prohibiting women's ordination, as long as God has mightily used women in the history of His people. So the opinions are not homogenous.

Factors influencing women's ordination in Africa

The influence of lay preachers
In Africa, lay preachers are very influential. Some of them are even more influential than church pastors. Many of them are the Bible workers and church planters. Like Paul, their words become reference points. The status that has been acquired by the laymen over the years makes their positions on doctrinal issues authoritative. Their deep knowledge about biblical texts strengthens their authority.

In the late twentieth century, many Adventist leaflets came to Africa. Most of them were from Adventist independent ministries. There was such strong emphasis on Ellen White’s writings that they became almost more authoritative than the scripture. Most of the laymen read the majority of these leaflets and became very conservative about what supposedly was true Adventism.

Literal reading of scripture
Literalistic reading of the Bible contributed to the way Adventism is practiced. Many of the early pastors received pastoral training rather than theological training, and even those who did theology could not break away from their fundamentalism. Many of the pastors who tried to curb some of these erroneous literal readings of scripture had serious problems with the laymen.

Misinformation of church affairs
Between 1990 and 1995 when the issue of women's ordination became a big issue within the Adventist Church, many laymen saw the shift as an attack of Satan against the church. I remember very well that some laymen advised us to pray for the church because it was becoming apostate. To the laymen, it was not about what one thinks about the issue. Neither did they see the issue as being about doctrinal accuracy. It was simply a non-starter. By their sharp refutation and call for prayer against the issue, many church members, out of ignorance, were induced to follow suit.

The rise and influence of Pipim
Samuel Koranteng-Pipim is one of the preeminent scholars the church in Africa has produced. He has been a blessing to the Adventist churches in Africa as well as the Adventist church in general. His own issues and weaknesses must be seen as a condition that happens to many people. The same way Peter was struggling with ethnic hypocrisy or Paul struggling with his ego, and many of the church fathers too struggled with theological idealism, so Pipim also as a human being had his own issues and weakness.

Pipim’s methodology is very simple: The Bible is the inspired Word of God. The Bible’s plain utterances must not be compromised with human sophistries. Pipim is a passionate preacher who speaks with power and great authority. He rose as “one-man-thousand” waging theological warfare against contemporary torrents of liberalism and intellectual philosophies, as he understood them.  Pipim’s books, "Receiving the Word" (1996) and "Must We Be Silent?" (2001) summed up his theological ideals nicely.

By the turn of the twenty-first century, Pipim’s fame had already spread across the borders of Africa, especially among the Anglophone states. His persuasive DVD PowerPoint presentations captivated the attention of the youth. His book, "Must We Be Silent?" received great attention as he and like-minded authors discussed sensitive and controversial contemporary issues facing the Adventist Church such as methods of biblical interpretation, women's ordination, and homosexuality.

Pipim’s position on Women Ordination is an emphatic “No!”  There is no theological issue that has caught his attention more than that of women's ordination. He spent a considerable time to discuss and respond to some of the biblical passage used in support of women's ordination. Thorough as they appear, it is not difficult to perceive the voice of Pipim behind the texts. There is not a single line without the pungent decrying of any agenda towards the legitimation of women's ordination. His logic is compelling and his knowledge of Scripture is keen.

Many of the pastors and laymen in Africa who began reading Pipim’s books came to be fascinated by his profound knowledge in dealing with such complex issues. The weight of biblical passages in his writings and the coinciding of his views with those of the typical African congregation on the issue made it much easier to embrace his ideas without question; he was seen as the Paul of our day. His book, "Must We Be Silent?" became the reference point in the case against women's ordination. His exposure to Adventist students, including theological students, reinforced his authority in Africa. In sum, Pipim's arguments against women's ordination carried a great deal of cout. Such reliance is natural with human beings.

A matter of theological disagreement
Authority and power overlap in Africa’s gender roles and responsibilities. Though men’s authority may supersede that of women because of their social and political roles, the traditional conceptual context does not provide enough argument against women's ordination. Such an attempt would have to be taken on face value or a generalization of some unethical behavior of few men’s authoritarianism. Any male authoritarianism must therefore be seen and criticized as a deviation from traditional values, not only in Africa, but as is commonly suffered by many women in world societies.

I conclude that many Africans' positions against or for women's ordination must be seen as theological. While some have been influenced by lay preachers and others at the end of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries by the writings of authors like Pipim. It must be well noted that Pipim, in all of his voluminous studies on the subject, never attributed people’s convictions against women's ordination to sociological factors. He definitely emphasized that the issue has always been considered on theological grounds.

So what will Africans do should women's ordination be legitimated? Nothing! Contrary views aside, Africans are more open to the unity of church, perhaps, even than the West. For more than 125 years of Adventism in Africa, no offshoot has sprung from the continent and been successful. Those who even brought some to the continent are finding it hard to maintain progress.

Should someone ask me if there will be disintegration in Africa in case women's ordination is accepted by the church, my answer will be simple, “NO!”


Title Image: Ghanaian delegates at the 2010 General Conference Session in Atlanta, Georgia. Jared Wright / Spectrum.

Note: This article originally contained a paragraph noting that certain participants in the Theology of Ordination Study Committee from Africa were open to the idea of women being ordained. After those details were called into question, the author asked that the paragraph be removed. - Ed.


Clifford Owusu-Gyamfi, originally from Ghana, is pursuing a Master's of Theology degree from the inter-faculty universities of Lausanne and Geneva, Switzerland.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

(Thomas J Zwemer) #2

Given Pippin’s behavior, one must conclude that regardless of what he may have written, his view of women was carnal-period. Thus not definitive of any theological or sociological postulates. Tom Z

(Kevin Paulson) #3

The Africans mentioned here as members of the Theology of Ordination Study Committee can speak for themselves, of course. But as one who sat with them on this Committee, and became particularly close to Sampson Nwaomah during our discussions, it was very clear to me that he opposed women’s ordination.

I don’t recall hearing any of the Africans on the Committee speak in favor of women’s ordination, or of regional settlement of the issue. Those representatives of the African Divisions who came to present their various reports to us were in general quite negative about the practice.

Elder Paul Ratsara, president of the Southern Africa-Indian Ocean Division, the largest of the world Divisions, also served on the Committee, and is strongly opposed to women’s ordination.


Maybe check this link on Kwabena Donkor. Sampson Nwaomah his views wasn’t clear enough to me, I agree with you. Daniel Bediako upholds the egalitarian view or I misread him. I will call attention to the editors. Thank you.

(Thomas J Zwemer) #5

Kevin The essay was geared to deny bigotry and support rational theological reasoning. It failed to do so, Pippin is no source of Truth. Please explain Women Judging Israel prior to Samuel. The renting od the veil was a profound event. The priesthood of all believers cast gender aside as to spiritual leadership in any pastoral sense. My academy principal was a woman that reinforced my parents guidance into the Gospel of Grace. It matured under Dr Heppenstsll. It certainly overshadowed denominationalism. Each person can come boldly to the throne of Grace. Pastoring is a teaching function. Teaching is as much or more listening as talking.It is walking humbly with ones God. None of which is gender specific. Tom Z.

(Elaine Nelson) #6

Now it is revealed for many who might not have been aware, that Pipim’s influence extended far in the African heart.

Regardless, that should have no reason why those unions who have different reasons to be guided by their own constituencies, not any one division or more. For those who are not willing to ordain women they should not be forced to do so; and for those that have long been ready to ordain women, no divisions should prevent it.

(Kevin Paulson) #7

Cliff, I don’t recall any Africans on the Committee who clearly upheld the egalitarian view. Certainly Sampson did not. In my contact with Africans here at Andrews University and at a Nigerian camp meeting where I was recently the speaker, I am quite sure they are united—young as well as old—against interchangeable roles for men and women in ministry.

Tom, this is not about “bigotry,” but about faithfulness to God’s Word. The apostle Paul is quite clear that the gospel of grace has not “cast gender side” as a qualification for spiritual leadership (e.g. I Cor. 11:3; Eph. 5:22-25; I Tim. 2:12-13). The principle of the priesthood of all believers existed in the Old Testament also (Ex. 19:6), as well as the New (I Peter 2:9). But this principle did not mean all Israelies were qualified to serve in the sanctuary, nor does it mean women are called to headship roles in the Christian church.

I didn’t quote Samuel Pipim, though I will not cast aside the value of his scholarship on account of his moral failings. The Bible he quoted still teaches what it teaches, irrespective of the shortcomings of any human messenger. Those who keep harping on Dr. Pipim’s fall as a means of discrediting his convictions only demonstrate how weak and flawed their case truly is.

I am most grateful for the courage and candor of our African believers on the ordination question, and pray they will hold the line with uncompromising firmness so far as Biblical gender authority in the Seventh-day Adventist Church is concerned.

(David Read) #9

My recollection accords with Kevin’s. I recall one dinner-table conversation with three members from Africa, and they seemed opposed to women’s ordination (although I did not take names or check boxes).

(Kevin Paulson) #10

I believe I was present at that particular dinner conversation, David.

(le vieux) #12

It’s similar to rejecting everything Jones and Waggoner wrote and preached before they apostatized. Makes no sense. If what Pipim wrote was truth before his failures, it did not cease to be truth afterwards.

(Thomas J Zwemer) #15

Kevin We are limiting Pippin’s view of women in and out of the Church leadership. To differ with you is not a flaw but an honor. Tom Z

(Carolyn Parsons) #16

What he preached and wrote about the role of women is certainly put into doubt considering his actual abusive behaviors against women.

(Rheticus) #17

The original article is not disagreeing with you about this.

What he is saying is

  1. It is NOT a cultural issue in Africa
  2. African laity and some African clergy/theologians have placed more weight on the opinions and writings of conservative Western SdA than they have on Scripture
  3. And hence a voted for women’s ordination will be seen as a change/clarification in the dominant Western view and that change will not cause the African SdA any serious problems

(Winona Winkler Wendth) #18


This analysis (apologia?), full of self-contradiction, more or less self-destructs.


(Kim Green) #19

Though I appreciate the article in many ways…it is hard to accept some of the premises without some real statistics or studies.

Then there are David and Kevin chiming in that THEY spoke with the same people and came away with entirely different views?? Now, I don’t believe that both of them are lying- so there’s a real disconnect.

(2nd Opinion) #21

“Those who keep harping on Dr. Pipim’s fall as a means of discrediting his convictions only demonstrate how weak and flawed their case truly is.”

I disagree. True, everyone’s theology should be able to stand on its own merits without being propped up by the disparagement of others’ views. That aside, though,I believe Dr. Pipim’s theological views with regard to women and male authority provided a hospitable framework for his his sexual misconduct.

(Kevin Paulson) #22

The fact is that Third World Adventists oppose women’s ordination on Biblical, not cultural grounds. The same holds true for Western Adventists who oppose women’s ordination. This is a struggle between a strictly Biblical approach to theology and spirituality and a counter-approach which mitigates the authority of God’s written counsel through human opinion, human culture, human scholarship, and human experience.

(Kevin Paulson) #23

That comment, my anonymous friend, is disgusting and totally uncalled for. It is an insult to every godly Christian male for whom Biblical gender roles offer a framework for demonstrating Christ’s self-sacrificing love for His church (Eph. 5:25).

Like Rudy Guiliani’s recent comments about President Obama, your statement here qualifies as “horrible.” But unlike the former New York City mayor, you have the ;luxury of anonymity when you fling your low blows. Quite unfortunate.

(Rheticus) #24

I think you don’t understand the difference between “one school of interpretation of the Bible” and “Biblical”

Biblical is something like “Thou shalt not commit adultery” or “Love thy neighbor as thyself” - where the general intent, if not the precise details, are clear.

That a conservative branch of Western SdA’ism has settled on a specific interpretation of the Bible about women’s ordination is not in question. However their same methods of interpretation conclude that the Roman Empire ruled the whole world, that slaves should obey their masters, and that adultery is punished by stoning. As a consequence there are a lot of SdA theologians, including those who declared the issue “non-theological” who disagree that these methods of interpretation invariably lead to truth.

The African SdA are opposed to Womens ordination, as the article clearly states, because of an over-reliance by some African SdA on Western conservative SdA thought.

(Kim Green) #25

Please explain what you consider to be:

I hardly find what 2nd Opinion wrote to be that.