Reflections on Annual Council

I had the opportunity to drive from Berrien Springs to Battle Creek, along with my wife, and spend Sunday, October 14, 2018, at Battle Creek. We sat in the gallery of the Kellogg Arena and listened to the Sunday afternoon discussion of the so-called Unity document.

One thing that struck me about this document was that it did not arise simply in response to the dispute over the ordination of women. The seeds of this document were sown way back in 2010 at the beginning of the Presidency of Elder Ted Wilson. Some of us will remember that in his inaugural sermon on the last Sabbath of the 2010 GC Session, Elder Wilson called upon church members to watch their pastors and call them to account for faulty theology and to keep an eye on our Colleges and Universities and to speak out against any deviant teachings. Thus was inaugurated an era of suspicion and distrust in the administration of our church. It was a small beginning but it has had a far-reaching divisive effect.

Some think that division has been caused by the question of women’s ordination. I submit respectfully that it is rather the reaping of the sowing by the GC President over the past eight years. If any pastor in a local church in South Africa managed to divide his congregation as successfully as Elder Ted Wilson has done, there would be no further call for him in the Conference. His pastoral work would end.

I believe that a General Conference President is called upon to unite all elements in the world church. He is there to unite and bring all members together. This means working in the interests of the ultra conservatives, the conservatives, the progressives and the liberals. The presentation of the gospel and the love of God should endeavor to unite all strands into one united body. God respects differences and gave Himself in Jesus Christ for the whole world.

It appears to me that at the beginning of his presidency, Elder Wilson decided to throw in his weight on the side of the ultra conservatives to the neglect of the other segments. I say ultra conservatives as I consider myself a conservative and I am uncomfortable with the direction of Elder Wilson. Perhaps he sees the ultra conservatives as the true remnant and sees himself as called to shake out the non-compliant elements. We remind ourselves that Jesus said in response to the suggestion by the disciples to pull out the tares, “Let both grow together until the harvest.” It is not the spirit of Christ to try and cause a shaking or an elimination of the so-called tares before the harvest.

In the context of this document it has also been mentioned that some Unions are in rebellion. Actually the Pacific Union and the Columbia Union are not in rebellion. Long before the 2015 GC Session these two Unions felt led of God and their constituents to go ahead and recognize the calling of God with regard to their female pastors. For them there was no rebellion. The move was prompted by the Holy Spirit. It was an act of conscience. They believed that the prophecy of Joel was being fulfilled before their eyes: “And it shall come to pass afterward that I will pour out My Spirit on all flesh; Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy…And also on My menservants and on My maidservants I will pour out My Spirit in those days” (Joel 2:28, 29).

Any so-called rebellion could have been forestalled by the General Conference leadership before San Antonio in 2015. The report of the TOSC clearly supported the idea that while Scripture does not command the ordination of women it does not forbid it. It is generally known that Elder Wilson does not favor the ordination of women. If he and the leadership had read the signs of the times correctly they could have had a different outcome at San Antonio. They could have asked for reports from successful women pastors from the NAD, from Europe and from China. This would have followed the Jerusalem Council model when the apostles gave reports of what the Lord was doing amongst the Gentiles. Once they heard these reports they took the action which they did.

The leadership could have easily presented a win-win motion to the Session rather than one that was bound to lead to division. After a presentation by women pastors and an appeal to the leading of the Holy Spirit and on the basis of the TOSC report imagine if the leadership had spent time urging the delegates to allow each Division or Union to permit the ordination of women pastors where it was felt feasible to do this for the sake of the furtherance of the gospel. With the strong backing of the GC leadership the world church might even have simply voted for consensus.

The leadership could have followed the advice of Gamaliel when he said, “I say to you, keep away from these men [and women] and let them alone; for if this plan or this work is of men, it will come to nothing; but if it is of God, you cannot overthrow it — lest you even be found to fight against God” (Acts 5:38, 39). Imagine both sides winning and avoiding the tension and the division we have at the moment. And so I would say that the leadership has brought the crisis on themselves; it cannot be shifted to Unions that followed their conscience on Scriptural grounds in the tradition of the Protestant Reformation.

A few further thoughts on my Battle Creek experience.

The Rehoboam Syndrome

In listening to the discussion of the document I could not help but think of the experience of King Rehoboam, the son of Solomon.

Upon succeeding Solomon, Rehoboam was approached by Jeroboam and Israel to know how he would rule them. They asked him for a lighter reign than they had enjoyed under his father. He consulted the elders in his kingdom. They counseled him to be kind to his citizens and to treat them with love. We know that he rejected their counsel and listened to another group who advised him to be very tough with his followers. This resulted in the breakup of the kingdom. Jeroboam and ten tribes broke away and became Israel. Rehoboam remained king in Jerusalem with the tribe of Judah and Benjamin.

Is there any lesson in this story for Elder Wilson? During the past months and in fact over the past few years older men have been giving him advice on the direction the church should take. Some of these older men have been Dr. George Knight, well known Adventist church historian and scholar. Another has been Elder William Johnsson, longtime former editor of the Adventist Review. Has Elder Wilson read his book, Where Are We Headed? Adventism after San Antonio? There has also been the counsel of former General Conference President, Elder Jan Paulsen, sadly mocked by some GC delegates at the 2015 Session. Turning his back on these seasoned counselors, it appears that Elder Wilson has lent his ear to another group of counselors!

As I listened to the presentations on that Sunday afternoon, October 14, I once again listened to reasoned counsel from seasoned church leaders from the NAD and from Europe, counseling Elder Wilson to draw back from the extreme steps entailed in the document. This document that barely reached the agenda by a slender vote of 32 for, 30 against, and two abstentions. Despite all of this counsel, he chose to listen to other voices. Will the result be similar to that in the days of Rehoboam or will the Lord in His mercy and grace bring out a more favorable result? Israel and Judah paid the price for the wrong decision of King Rehoboam. Will the Seventh-day Adventist church pay a price because of the decision of our General Conference President?

The Arm of the Law

Another issue that became of great concern to me as I listened to the presentation promoting the document and as I contemplated the five Compliance Committees, was the heavy hand of the law. The GC Legal Counsel was one of the five presenters who spoke to the merits of the document. In addition, I discovered that each of the five Compliance Committees will have a legal counsel on them. Aside from the issue of the expense of the entire enterprise, is the disturbing turn to the arm of the law to make sure that actions are legal and are carried out. I am simple enough to believe that this is foreign to the spirit of the apostolic church of the first century as depicted in the book of Acts. It was the persecuting power of the church that turned to the law to punish the early believers.

As a church we have long taught that when the church turns to the state (law) to enact and force its dogmas and teachings upon the people we will have an image to the beast (see Revelation 13:11-18). We never thought that this prophecy might be fulfilled, even in part, by the Seventh-day Adventist Church. We remind ourselves that Revelation depicts the last church as being in a state of blindness and that it cannot see. Some of us have been blind to the subtle inroads of the legal system into our own ranks. It is a sad day when we have to depend on the law instead of on the gospel and the mercy and grace of the Lord. Jesus said, “By this shall all men know that you are my disciples if you have love one to another” (John 13:35).

Which Way Now?

All concerned members of the church must ask the question, “Which way must the church now go?”

Of course it would be ideal and wonderful if Elder Wilson could sense the impasse and be led by the Holy Spirit to make a radical change in his approach and method of leadership. He is a sincere, godly man and if he could really dedicate himself to leading every grouping in the world church in a fair and even-handed manner it would be to the honor of the Lord. It also means that he should reassure the Unions of their legitimate authority and entrust the issue of the ministry into their hands. He would also have to wholeheartedly embrace the right of Unions to ordain women pastors where that is the desire of the constituents and for the furtherance of the mission of the church.

If Elder Wilson feels that he is unable to make this radical change to embrace the entire world church, he should do the honorable thing and step down from office. Someone should be appointed, led by the Holy Spirit, who is a person of peace, full of the Holy Spirit and of wisdom and who is dedicated to every segment of the church. One who is able to lead conservatives, progressives, and liberals. One who is able to present and embody the great principles of Adventism and to inspire all generations from the younger to the older.

Such a leader, under the guidance of his peers, might want to call a world council with adequate representatives from every segment of the church, including administrators, pastors, scholars, and youth representing every grouping of the church to look at the structure of the church. The last time that was done was in 1901 in the days of Ellen White.The goal would be to simplify, to modernize, to decentralize, and to spiritualize the structure. The world church could be challenged to make our movement one of dynamism, of liberty in Christ, of attraction, and of power.

Dr. Eric and Mrs. Ruth Webster were both born in South Africa. He began his ministry in 1949 and has been a church pastor, a Conference President, a Theology professor, the director of the Voice of Prophecy in South Africa and upon retirement at the age of 64 took on the management and the editorship of the Signs of the Times on a self-supporting basis. He ceased this work at the end of 2012 at the age of 85. Eric and Ruth have emigrated to the USA at the age of 91 and 92. They came at the end of September and have their green cards.

Image Credit: / Brent Hardinge / Adventist News Network

We invite you to join our community through conversation by commenting below. We ask that you engage in courteous and respectful discourse. You can view our full commenting policy by clicking here.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

A true, Spirit led, lovingly embracing, inclusive and caring response. God bless you


i’m not too worried about TW…indianapolis 2020 is less than 2 yrs away, at which point i expect him to retire…nothing he’s initiated now will take effect before then, and a new president can easily undo all the damage that’s been done…it’s probably just as well to let him serve out his 2nd term for the sake of the office, if nothing else…when folkenberg was forced to resign, at about the same point in his second term as TW is in his, i don’t think it had a good effect on the morale of the church…

and i don’t think we have the makings of a rehoboam moment…TW won’t be in office for long, and there’s plenty to hope for under a new administration…i think we can all hold on until then…

1 Like

we must remember that one of the good things that TW’s tenure has accomplished is the gathering into the fold of the hundreds, and possibly thousands, of extreme conservatives who left the church in the '90’s…for instance, hartland institute has now agreed to forward tithe through the church, which it wasn’t willing to do before…

TW has been a beacon of hope for many extreme conservatives who are caught up in endless criticism of and bitterness towards NAD, its unions and its conferences…i’m not sure this could have been accomplished under anyone but TW…


As in parenting, the goal is to consider what the best interest of the child requires, not what would serve the best interest of the parents. Likewise for organizations, especially parochial organizations, officers MUST consider what would be the best interest of the organization, not what would serve the best interest of the officers.

We are all waiting for what our honorable GC President will choose.


President Nixon and President Clinton were extremely effective presidents but will forever be known for “I am not a crook” and “I did not have sex with that woman.” All it takes is one bad behavior to ruin a reputation. Why this is so difficult to learn is beyond me. Let us see whether our honorable GC President has learned this lesson or not.


to be honest, i doubt TW will learn the lesson you’re suggesting he should be learning…understand that he is wildly popular with extreme conservatives in NAD, not to mention africa and other parts of the global south…there are more people who think he should do more to divide the church than those who believe he should ease up…add to that the fact that he probably does think PUC should be dismantled, and it’s hard to see that he’ll learn any lessons…

the good news is that battle creek is behind us, and nothing will come of it between now and the election of a new president…TW has placated his base - he’s done as much as they can reasonably expect…and he’s fulfilled what has probably been a personal longing to be as decisive as his father was with glacier view…there’s no need for him to drop any more bombshells…in any case, i doubt there are any more in his arsenal…


I have been deeply saddened by the Annual Council. The sermon by Elder Ted Wilson on October 13 struck a serious chord when 18 times (very interesting number) he said, “Stand firm against…” This is distressing because that is what I am finding is happening on the local level of churches. Those who are interested in Adventism from a variety of backgrounds are experiencing the “stand firm against” attitude from pastors and others. Our church is not embracing those of other faiths who are showing an interest in what Adventism has to offer. I find that sermons have a lot of finger pointing and words like “rebuke” and “discipline” in them. Where is the love and acceptance of Jesus? The top person of an organization has tremendous influence in what happens at all levels of that organization. When we view people as ones whom we need to “stand firmly against”, what does that say about how we view them and how we view Jesus (who was known to hang out with the less than perfect crowd)? Unity of Spirit can only happen in an atmosphere of love where Jesus is embraced and people are drawn together because of who Jesus is, not because we all cookie cutter copies of each other. May we and our churches become safe places for people to experience God’s love.



Americans didn’t expect Trump to be elected. Perhaps he didn’t either. I don’t think we can respond to what Ted has started without assuming he will be reelected.


Words of wisdom from one of our elder statesmen - and I felt I heard the Holy Spirit speaking through Elder Webster! Let us consider them carefully and prayerfully.

What a significant and accurate observation this was: “If any pastor in a local church in South Africa managed to divide his congregation as successfully as Elder Ted Wilson has done, there would be no further call for him in the Conference. His pastoral work would end.”

I pray a way will be found for us to remain one body. What wisdom Elder Webster shared regarding this is very important: “I believe that a General Conference President is called upon to unite all elements in the world church. He is there to unite and bring all members together. This means working in the interests of the ultra conservatives, the conservatives, the progressives and the liberals. The presentation of the gospel and the love of God should endeavor to unite all strands into one united body. God respects differences and gave Himself in Jesus Christ for the whole world.” Our 20 million+ members are never going to all be ultraconservatives, conservatives, progressives, or liberals. We are different - but one body in the Lord. Let’s respect our differences and each other, and lay aside the accusatory language.


Ted Wilson has given Process Theology an entirely new meaning. It now means My Way or the Highway.


Dear Eric,

When I was a child and teenager in a South Africa, you were one of my role models and mentors!

I am in admiration and awe of your beautifully articulated analysis of Adventism’s current appalling and abysmal autocratic administration, led by TW.

I had hoped that there would be a vote of no confidence in this papal potentate at the recent Autumn council.

As you so eloquently outline, from day one of his administration he has been divisive and dictatorial. He is attempting to foster an era reminiscent of the Russian KGB and the East German Stasi( secret police ) with church members and employees denouncing each other for alleged sins and shortcomings.

He emulates Trump with his divisivness. So sad to see political manipulation and machinations within the church body!


I have commented several times that his true mind set was exposed when he as VP removed the salt shakers. I pity his poor wife. He must live in a world of his own. Now for the clincher, does he shave on Sabbath morning.? Is his head that bald or does he shave that also?


Nancy how true your words are! If we are going to attract people to our fellowship we need churches of grace. I am sure there was quite a difference in approach between the Pharisees and Jesus. Pharisees concentrated on rules; Jesus focussed on people. So much depends on the pastor and the leadership of a church.
We have just come from Helderberg College church in South Africa. I am glad to say that the pastor in that church is a man of grace. I was happy to be associate with him in leadership. I am thinking of a lady who has been coming to the church for the last few months. She became convinced of the Sabbath and through a friendly contact started attending. She faces opposition from her husband and from her grown daughters. She comes to church with her necklace and her fairly heavy makeup. She is welcomed and embraced at the church. She has enough opposition from home; she needs love and acceptance at church. She is getting that. Those peripherals are between her and God and the Lord loves and accepts her as much as He does the pastor. She will continue to grow in the Lord as will each member of the congregation.


Dear Robin, nice to hear from you and thank you for your kind words! I think back to the Orange Grove church in Johannesburg. I will always remember your father, Connie, as such an excellent Sabbath School teacher. I was pastor of the church and was always blest to be in his class.
Always good to read your contributions on this site. Your words are passionate and come from the heart. One can tell that here is a man who is concerned for the church and for its image to the world. One who would like to walk in the footsteps of the great Master, Jesus Christ. Keep up your courage in the Lord!


As an eighty two year old male, I have no decisive views, pro or con on women church members wearing jewelry.

Although I do on occasion buy necklaces and broaches for my three adult daughters. (no longer Adventists) if the items are tasteful and well priced.

An elegant item of jewelry that is tasteful and not flashy enhances the costume if color coordinated.

In my itinerant wandering through Adventist churches, I do use jewelry as a guide to the amount of money I donate in the offering plate. If a few women are wearing jewelry, that is an indication that the congregation is non judgmental. A jundgmental church would have banished those women with harsh words and condemnation… so I give generously to their church budget.

My contributions in churchs where no jewelry is evident are meager or none!

I attended a church for several months (not my home church ) that was undertaking extensive renovations. Since I had made a killing in the stock market, I was about to give a large contribution for the finishing of the construction. Fortunately I asked a pertinent question; How many women elders in this congregation?? I was answered derisively that they did not believe in women elders (even though the majority occupying the pews were female). Needless to say, my checkbook remained unopened!


I am absolutely THRILLED with this crisis continuing.

See these attacks on compliance:

The SDA denomination needs to be shaken, rattled & rolled.

God thinned Gideon’s army from 30,000+ to just 300 so they wouldn’t glory in the victory.

I was in the Marines during Vietnam time when there were draftees, racial problems, dope use, alcohol overuse, protests, and low morale. I work with several former Marines and 10 years after I got out the USMC thinned the herd by administering drug tests. One Marine employee said that 3/4 of his company was thinned out because they failed the drug test.

God will thin out the SDA herd. The sooner the better.

1 Like

Oh let us never be judgmental…woe if we are.

I remember visiting the church, where I attended during my youngest SDA years and got baptized at. The woman greeter at the foyer was dripping with jewelry and had max cleavage visible. My wife made a comment to me and I knew that the woman would be history soon at that church and leave on bad terms. Yep, never saw her again on return visits. So much for the desperate decisions of the nominating committee.


You gleefully exult in a rift, / rupture / rent in the church fabric (shame in you!).

You are desirous of ridding the church of those
of us who place high value on our mothers, sisters, female cousins, nieces and granddaughters,

Those of us who want for them to be vessels for God, should the Holy Sprit call them,

Those of us who recognize the demographics that the majority of people occupying our pews are female and as such, deserve a compelling role, more than being the cleanup crew for the church potluck.

Please be advised,Gideon that some of us are also desirous of a divorce from bigots, misogynists and homophobes. Be advised that we loathe being UNEQUALLY YOKED with judgmental hypocrites!