It is no stretch at all, because the gospel Paul expounded in Galatians was in the context of the Jew/Gentile divide. That those divides were part of the old order of things, which the law/Torah marked out. The new covenant/ gospel community of Christ and his Spirit was no longer to be defined by such distinctions and status, based on religion, ethnicity, gender, or class.
This is no addendum to the gospel, it is to be the visible manifestation of it on this earth. IOW, the gospel, and righteousness by faith are all about community, Godâs new creation, a united and equal humanity in Christ Jesus, that seeks to practice the type of self giving love that Jesus himself displayed.
An individualized gospel, that privatizes faith and stresses interior experience over other centered love and community relationships, and largely treats sin as discreet, personal bad habits to be mastered, totally misses what Paul was preaching and dealing with in a letter such as Galatians. In short, it trivializes his gospel.
It is this individualized American version of the gospel that enables people to say that Jesus is their personal savior, while excusing or participating in systemic racism without batting an eye. An Adventist version, that stresses Sabbath observance, food laws, and belief in EGW and peculiar doctrines as the identifying marks of Godâs people, over against this type of Christ like community and love, equally misses the mark.
Christians, whether in the church, or in relation to society, cannot stand for anything different, and say they are walking in line with the truth of the gospel.
ThanksâŚ
Frank
@gideonjrn
Your initial reaction to the article was to say that there is a gap between the gospel and Galatians 3:28. Iâve given you a concise description of how that isnât so. Iâve outlined briefly how the gospel and its implications in Galatians is integral to a Christian response to what we now face in our societyâŚthe tragedy this article addresses. Iâve also been specific about how distortions of it can and have possibly contributed to the underlying problems within the church regarding racism.
Youâve given nothing positive except a negative response about so many different gospels, and flip comments about personal sin. Why not respond with something substantive and positive, rather than a continual stream of negativity? How does your understanding of the gospel give direction and power to believers and the believing community to respond effectively to what we are facing?
Frank