Taoism and Christianity: Anything in Common?

A few years ago, I was called to fill in when the expected Sabbath School teacher, through an honest mix up, did not come. In what was doubtless a Holy Spirit lift, I found myself speaking about the importance of discipleship with greater depth and understanding than I had previously consciously known. It came together more beautifully than I am typically able to accomplish when I spend hours in preparation. The pastor then crowned this experience by focusing on discipleship in his sermon; actually repeating several of the angles we had discussed in class. With this memory in my pocket, discipleship has been on my mind more than ever. What is it like to have a comprehensive walk with Jesus – all the time?

Despite the best efforts of some, we humans are not immune to the culture of the age. In an unconscious perversion, American Christianity has absorbed the current transactional consumer capitalistic culture that seems to infuse every aspect of society. This vein of Christianity places an emphasis on naming and claiming, rather than commitment to transformation and discipleship. Indeed, unchecked, our consumerist ethos has diverted a lot of us onto a path that is almost the exact opposite of discipleship. Jesus calls people to take up their cross and follow Him. Not take up shopping carts and acquire wealth or collect truisms. A follower of Jesus is not a status, and neither is it static or stationary.

Even if some have appeared to avoid the materialistic side of consumerism, they have sought to gain position by promoting a powerful sovereignty by legislative advocacy within the state and the church, thinking that to pursue a walk with Jesus, one needs to focus on being right with distinctive beliefs and truisms. Then God will “save us.” This is idolatry and a coercive stance that has caused organized religion to lose authority with many. Does being a follower of Jesus mandate attachment to certitude (fearfully)?

How then do we in the 21st century take up the cross and follow Him? Can it involve a variety of nuances which will capture the hearts and minds of the current generation? Are some of these lessons to be learned from other faiths and philosophies, since surely the Holy Spirit is working with all in all ages?

Taking a university philosophy class this spring, I have been struck by some overlap between Taoism and my heritage of being born into Christian thought and scripture. Could some of the fundamental precepts of Taoism speak to our quest of discipleship? In our times, many are rejecting a religion, which often uses a reductionist method that seeks only to prove points and seems to ignore synergistic power that cannot be dissected or fully understood.

Yes, belief in a Supreme Being automatically puts Christianity in a different arena than Taoist thought. For us, the crucifixion of the Son of God impacts all we believe and do. Lao-Tzu, the apocryphal founder of Taoism, recognized no supreme being, but only a fluid power that is difficult to categorize. Taoists use water as a metaphor for describing the power in their way of life. Water is malleable. Yet, it is powerful. It will enter wherever there is an opening, and it follows a path without complaining (like the Holy Spirit?).

Rather than focus on a three-tiered universe of heaven, earth, hell, Taoist thought focuses on the present; how one can optimally occupy herself now. In essence, asking the same question popularized by Francis Schaefer’s documentary “How Should We Then Live?” A Taoist does not advocate a hedonistic journey, but a way of life that assumes the optimal frame of mind will be healthiest for all to thrive. Nor is the Taoist pathway blatantly antinomian. Rather, Taoist thinking recognizes the complexity of the moment, thus urging people to be perceptive and aware, yet face life without fear.

Release the Labels of Events and Person

With beginnings at approximately 500 B.C., Taoism features a poetic willingness to embrace the unexpected and optimistically wait for positive outcomes. The first step in Taoist thought is the realization that once one names something as worthy of desire or attainment, then a person experiences a sort of confinement of one’s own making. If one has this limitation, then how can one arrive at the optimal destination? Thus, Taoists distrust the action of labeling, doubting one’s ability to properly distinguish between the good and bad or knowledge and wisdom.

Chuang Tzu, a Taoist Sage, told a parable about a farmer and his stallion that illustrates the humility of a wise one when tempted to pass value judgments on situations. A farmer responds to a neighbor’s compliment of his prize winning stallion with the phrase, “Who knows what is good and what is bad?” A series of events are described involving the farmer and his horse and each time the farmer says, “Who knows what is good and what is bad?” The denouement of the tale is when the stallion brings home a wild horse and the farmer’s son sustains a fracture trying to tame the horse and avoids being conscripted to war and thus demonstrates the blindness one truly has in assessing each circumstance.

One is reminded of the stance taken by Joseph who went from a spoilt favorite son to a slave to a prisoner to the 2nd highest ruler in Egypt. Yet through all the suffering and injustice, he remained faithful, saying to his brothers, “You meant it for harm, God meant it for good.” Genesis 50:20

Esther’s life was unconventional, as well, with high and low points. Eventually, Mordecai says to her, “And who knows but that you have come to your royal position for such a time as this?” Esther 4:14

From such a vantage point, one could say that a person is under an illusion when claiming that external events can hurt. One could also say that a person is under an illusion when claiming that external events can bring happiness. After all, an individual chooses to allow an event to hurt. Also in the end, an individual will discover the futility of basing happiness on external events.

Another self-deception occurs when a person chooses to embody the labels placed upon her by others. As soon as one believes a label, one starts on a tense journey, feeling obligated to maintain the image. For example, if you are known as a genius and you absorb that label, you will feel the pressure to act like a genius. Clinging to the desire of fulfilling a label confines a person. Smash the labels and a person is free. How freeing to simply be identified as a child of God, released from other human abstractions.

Even regarding one’s denominational affiliation, there is a special beauty and liberty in holding that identity lightly. This can provide an inoculation of sorts against deep disappointment about machinations in the church. In thus doing, a person can also avoid organizational idolatry and prideful presumption of privilege. Consider the lilies of the field. Taste and see that the Lord is good.

Solely reveling in the title “Child of God” strips away imposed confinements and words, moving a person closer to discipleship. It is easy to forget that words are only pointers. Or put another way, it is easy to only worship the teapot and not drink the tea. Words are the signifiers. Remember Jesus became The Word.

We can so easily fall into a trap of making words which speak of God, “the thing,” forgetting they are but a construct in which we see but a shadow of God dimly. By promoting our own understanding about God as the full manifestation, we construct mental idols and many under the Christian umbrella have become part of a system in which achieving “faith” is a mere defense of words and certitude. Unfortunately, that confidence is sometimes weaponized and becomes an obstacle for those seeking to follow God. We would all do well to reflect on the journeys of the apostles who, over time and in varied ways, had the scales removed from their eyes realizing that they never saw it all or understood it all.

Consider the Limitations of Debate

Taoists distrust debate as a means of ascertaining truth. As a light-hearted corrective to Confucian thought in the same era, they sought to reconfigure the role of reason. Chuang Tzu said:

Suppose I am arguing with you, and you get the better of me. Does the fact that I am not a match for you mean that you are really right and I am really wrong?…Must one of us necessarily be right and the other wrong, or may we not both be right or both be wrong?”

Indeed, Jesus seemed to relish a paradox and invite dialogue, shying away from using and proving arguments, that later became the standard of western thought. Many believe the vein of hypercertainty within Christianity is a reaction to culture now. A common critique of postmodernity states “Nothing matters and anything goes.” For many postmodern thought leaders, this is an inaccurate characterization. Rather, a more correct statement is, “It seems that everything matters, so where will we go?” Our era is complex and complicated. In an irony of our age, while computers, that infuse everything in our lives, require rigid programming to attain a desired result, the information age which it has formed, has resulted in a society that is less well programmed, messier, less rule-governed, more open-ended, more open-textured and societal results which are much more uncertain. We live in a time that people seem to know intuitively that all things do matter, so one is forced to seek, and then seek to attend to, what matters most, within the context of what else is seen and allowing that all is not seen. This sifting is performed in a diverse milieu of multiplicity, and detailed histories, with many observations and facts claiming to require the most urgent attention.

Bible readers are impacted by this worldview. In our information, sound-bite driven world, before dismissing the Bible entirely, many go through a period of attempting to grapple with Bible verses, seeking to determine which one takes precedence. Various groups like to hold up certain verses as all informative, yet ignore others. For example:

Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it. Proverbs 22:6. The examples of this not occurring are pervasive.

Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell. Proverbs 23:13, 14. With our society’s heightened awareness of child abuse, does this speak with authority to this age or provoke ridicule?

Then obvious contradictions are easy to find, such as:

Thou shalt not kill. Exodus 20:13

Thus sayeth the Lord God of Israel, Put every man his sword by his side. And slay every man his brother…companion…neighbor. Exodus 32:27

More than ever, people can access viewpoints which demonstrate the complexity, contradictions, caveats and translational differences in the Bible, prioritizing a need for development of a hermeneutic for the people that will confront these seeming inconsistencies. A common critique of Christianity is that one can choose scriptural passages to meet whatever her personal agenda may be. This makes debate the less effective method of forming disciples. Rather, prioritizing a daily reflection on the life of Christ with true humility is more important than ever as we study scripture, not for knowledge but for how to live in His kingdom.

Release the Agenda

The Taoist masters understood the power and force of waiting, as opposed to seeking or pushing for a certain outcome to occur at a prescribed time. Has our drive to finish the work stunted our discipleship?

Wintley Phipps offered a great phrase at a Prison Ministries Convention this spring: “Christ didn’t come to save us but to grow us.”

Christianity has been affected by worldly ethos in which a person barters, gets, attains, achieves and performs. Yet all of these activities bolster one’s own ego and seem to impede discipleship. What is it like to let Christ grow us?

Consider the beauty of being in the moment and aware. Consider the release for one who forsakes the drive to prove abstract points. This dovetails beautifully into our understanding of the Sabbath as a Park in Time1 in which we release our agendas and workaday role. Sigve Tonstad explores this aspect of Sabbath as part of the original meaning intended by our creator.2 Sabbath is a time to walk with the Lord of the Universe.

Beyond the Sabbath, one is wise to remember that in our everyday lives, we are created to be greater than mere production units. In single mindedly executing a to-do list, one misses opportunities for dialogue, joy, and wonder. Just be. Surrender. Let it be. Releasing any identification with fame or success. Be present. “This is the day the Lord has made.” Psalm 118:24

Don’t overschedule it. Don't try to extract the meaning from what is happening. Practice radical amazement as described by Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel:

Mankind will not perish for want of information; but only for want of appreciation. The beginning of our happiness lies in the understanding that life without wonder is not worth living. What we lack is not a will to believe but a will to wonder. Awareness of the divine begins with wonder. It is the result of what man does with his higher incomprehension. The greatest hindrance to such awareness is our adjustment to conventional notions, to mental clichés. Wonder or radical amazement, the state of maladjustment to words and notions, is therefore a prerequisite for an authentic awareness of that which is.”

Spanish poet Antonio Machado said, “By walking, one makes the road…” Directives, descriptions, and definitions may start a person on the road to a fulfilling life. But, a person becomes a dancer by dancing. A person develops into an effective mother by attending to the child. A disciple of Christ may not always be correct, but she will be connected to Christ and community. It is time to clasp solely onto the identity of a Christ follower. For in Him we live, move and have our being. With honesty. And humility.

1. Phrase coined by Fritz Guy 2. Tonstad, The Lost Meaning of the Seventh Day, Andrews University Press, 2009

Carmen Lau is a board member of Adventist Forum, the organization that publishes Spectrum. She lives and writes in Birmingham, Alabama.

Photo Credit: FreeImages.com / valerio lo bello

If you respond to this article, please:

Make sure your comments are germane to the topic; be concise in your reply; demonstrate respect for people and ideas whether you agree or disagree with them; and limit yourself to one comment per article, unless the author of the article directly engages you in further conversation. Comments that meet these criteria are welcome on the Spectrum Website. Comments that fail to meet these criteria will be removed.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at http://spectrummagazine.org/node/7433

Shane Claiborne and Tony Campolo in their book, Red Letter Revolution – What IF Jesus REALLY meant what he said?
Talk about the issue of Discipleship in churches.
They say the BIGGEST problem in Christian denomination [and I would presume that would include the Seventh-day Adventist denomination] is that they are mostly BELIEVERS and NOT Disciples.
Discipleship is very rare to find according to them.

Believers believe in the Doctrines [SDA 28, Baptist confession, etc] which brings them together as groups, but Very Few are in the Denomination for Discipleship and Transformation.

In both Christianity, Judaism and Taoism there are opportunities – free to choose, and forced by others and circumstances beyond our control. But both are essentially neutral. As stated, it is the mind-set that makes us see them different. All 3 philosophies promote having a meaningful life-style and one that keeps one healthy and wise, and making the best of them. In the Taoist it is the ability to choose by chance. To the religious opportunities are seen as guiding by a Higher Power. Some even see God being a Micro-manager of one’s life.
Both, the one’s I choose on my own, and the one’s I am forced to choose bring me gifts, and bring me people into my life. It is just that what ever ones I have, it is different people and long term experiences.
Playing a musical instrument [which ever I choose take me on a different path]. Career choice [dr., lawyer, baker, chief] places me different places. House or Apt I choose in the city or country affects my future. The religious group I choose to attend all bring different opportunities for religious growth or non-growth. Different opportunities for service or no service. Choice of place of employment brings its gifts.
All these are neutral. What makes them non-neutral is HOW we view a Higher Power who created all we enjoy. Idols do not necessarily have to be wood and stone, it can be just living without a “thought” about a loving Creator. The Psalms and Isaiah tell us how empty life is for those who have no conception of a Loving Creator, one Who bestows good gifts on both the Just and the Unjust. And the ability to have a pleasant relationship with this Creator. One whose only gift that They want is to Love Them, Love one’s “neighbor” by promoting Justice and Mercy in the land, which also includes the widows and orphans.One nation group, ethnic group, religious group toward another.
A promotion of turning Swords into Plows and Pruning Hooks. [In our day/age this includes bombs and misuse of guns, including swords]
Both a Taoist and a Christian-Jew can have a reasonable life. But, it is the Ability to say THANK YOU to a Creator for the Sun that warms you, the Rain that provides water to drink and grow food that brings optimal joy into the life experience.


Taoism is about man. Christainity is about Christ. Poles apart. TZ


Many beautiful and profound thoughts, Carmen. Thank-you.

I fear, however, that there will be natural resistance to many of your points because Adventism tends to breed an Apocalyptic and Fundamentalist mind process. Much of what you relate is only applicable if one accepts that there is a level of spirituality that is beyond the rules and regulations of Adventism. I don’t know if most church members will naturally rise above the “rules”.

True Christian “Discipleship” has at it’s core a lack of selfishness and complete trust solely in the guidance of the “Holy Spirit” to both guide and direct the individual. One must be completely and utterly devoted to taking action upon what is revealed- responsible only to God. Again…is this actually possible in a fundamentalist religion?

Thank-you for the beautiful snippet from Antonio Machado. I would like to post the end of his poem:

“Wanderer, there is no road-- Only wakes upon the sea.”

It seems so incompatible with Adventism in general…but I do see it in persons such as yourself, Carmen. I continue to hope and pray that there are more that will become “awake”.


“It’s the pointless things that give your life meaning. Friendship, compassion, art, love. All of them pointless. But they’re what keeps life from being meaningless.”
― Tim Winton

Lovely article Carmen. Thanks.

@TonyR @GraemeSharock


The idea of Sabbath as a Park in Time is credited to the very worthy Fritz Guy. Could you give me a reference? I remember a great article with that title by John McLarty from 2004.


R. Wresch, M.D.

1 Like

Thank you for your comment. I attended Guy’s Sabbath School Class in Loma Linda in the 1980s and heard the term. Rabbi Heschel wrote about it similarly, calling it “a palace in time.” http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/Judaism/2000/08/A-Palace-In-Time.aspx?p=1
You are correct that McLarty has been a voice in describing the concept to the masses within our denomination. http://archives.adventistreview.org/2001-1518/story1.html I am glad that this helpful visualization of Sabbath has continued to gain some attention from a variety of voices.

1 Like

I like many aspects of Taoist recommendations on diet. Proper food combinations , proper foods for optimum nourishment as currently known , and so on . However, as far as sex goes, Taoism is incompatible with SDA nuclear family practice. Other pathways may work for Taoists , and the The “Emperor” seeks and gets from the legendary PLAIN GIRL is more suited to a polygamic lifestyle than to our Christian lifestyle, ALTHOUGH there are aspects of individual practice which can enhance the appreciation of Christian couples for each other and perhaps add an often needed spark when such matters may be getting somewhat Ho Hum. As for Exodus 20:13, surely the better interpretation should be “Thou shalt not commit Murder” since the original seems to negate even self defense
actions where necessary.

I believe Christians are guided by the Holy Spirit and therefore make the most of their time . Taoism seems to suggest waiting or as I see it wasting time watching for something we perceive to be good to follow. Going with the flow always goes down the Holy Spirit is an uplifting experience .

To say Exodus 20:13 and Exodus 32:27 Are obvious contradictions is a misunderstanding of the context of each verse.
Thou shalt not kill. Exodus 20:13 Is a commandment of God for all people to live by.

While Exodus 32:27 Is the punishment handed down by the Lord after His righteous judgment against a disobedient people.

Thus sayeth the Lord God of Israel, Put every man his sword by his side. And slay every man his brother…companion…neighbor. Exodus 32:27
I believe they compliment and support each other.

A great perhaps.Most people have some sort of religion, at least they know which church they are staying away from. Adventism is American born. Not every SDA born Americans leap into belief that Ted Wilson, GC President and Dan Jackson, President of NAD are bros most agreeing partners opiate of the same masses the messes of Adventism in America. Taoism say, China is no bro to Adventism. China admires though the striking sterling acumen of the GC and NAD. The sterling fiscal economic swap off treasures to the Second Coming of Jesus Christ for cash below. Taoism and Christianity? Water meets Oil.

This is truly the one thing which I find bizarre. Caveat: I’ve only started my own journey after only recently waking up from the American Consumerism way of life.

I think your reply sums up discipleship much better, and ultimately I think that the SDA church is the one which is so close yet sadly still so far off from what I think we as humans should ascribe ourselves to. From what I see, a person should ascribe themselves to the Word of God, and not fall off the path and follow humans (White, Miller, etc.) or other spirits (The Tao, etc.)

In reading the Bible (not just picking out verses here and there – you literally have to read the whole thing start to finish, and no, I’m not completely done yet) - I have seen that God is merciful, cruel, jealous, just, and respectful of his people. BUT, even then you will find that he does not only refer to his own people. In Leviticus he mentions Strangers and travelers who come, live, and pass through the lives of his people. They are all offered the same respect as one Israelite had for each other.

I fell from reading and ascribing to the word when I picked up a Taoist manual and read it believing it helped me understand the Word better. True, there are some concepts that coincide; but reading the manual led me astray for better or worse answer. When I picked up reading the Bible again, it literally went over the same concepts that were in the Tao manual, but it comes with the morals that God wanted in his people.

My lesson here is that I will follow His Word; never the words of men and women when it comes to Spirituality.