Viewpoint: Offensive Dissonance in Cape Town


(system) #1

An open letter to Peter Landless, Director of Health Ministries for the GC.

Dear Doctor Landless, — a voice from the past.

Your family and my family were active in the Orange Grove, Johannesburg SDA church many decades ago. I have not seen you since you were a teenager. It has come to my attention that you are back in our motherland. Allow me to make some comments about your mission there. But first an update about myself.

I graduated from the medical school in Johannesburg, in 1959. While interning at the 2000-bed Barangwanath Hospital, in Soweto, hundreds of victims of the Sharpeville massacre, Africans, shot by white police, were admitted to my surgical unit. In a revulsion against Apartheid, I emigrated to the United States. I was fortunate to do my specialty training at the prestigious Ivy League schools, University of Pennsylvania, and Harvard. I served on the faculty of Harvard Medical School before going into private practice. The best choice I ever made was leaving South Africa!

And speaking of choice, I see that you are chairing a discussion on "Sexuality, a Disorder or a Choice" in Cape Town this week. If one's sexual orientation is a choice, then it has to be one of the most momentous, pivotal, defining, deliberate decisions of a lifetime. Please ask your attendees to pinpoint the moment, time, place and circumstances when they made the decision to be heterosexual. I doubt that any will have any memory that they made such a personal deliberate choice. My lovely lesbian niece has no memory of any such decision about her sexuality. She had no more input into her sexual orientation, than choosing her blonde hair or blue eyes.

The demographics are brutal and implacable. When children come up front for the children's story in Adventist worship services, one in 20/25 will grow up to be gay or lesbian. This is true whether they are in a Ugandan church, a Nigerian church, an Australian Church. a Canadian church, or a church in Outer Mongolia. My own four grandchildren are too young to discern their sexual identity, but I have a one in six chance that one of them will be gay/lesbian.

Adventist parents might wish that they had a magic potion or talisman that they could paint on the lintel of their doors when the birth angel passes over ( like the Israelites in Egypt of old, trying to escape the angel of death, destroying their first born on Passover). Regrettably, no such preventative exists, and Adventist parents of gay/lesbian kids have as little choice in the matter as do their offspring.

The church can demonize its gay/lesbian members. (One of the presenters at the Cape Town conference,recently proclaimed that gays/lesbians were demon possessed). The church can marginalize and stigmatize them, as it has done with brutal efficiency over many decades, resulting in a mass exodus of these members. The church can advocate to criminalize them and execute them. Our church leaders in Africa have given tacit and passive approval to these recent human rights violations against gays in Nigeria and Uganda. These pervasive church policies, show a total lack of Christian love and compassion.

But when the church uses pseudo science and outmoded theories to back up its crumbling foundations then it simply appears ridiculous. There is nothing that makes one lose more respect for an institution than when it appears ridiculous.

Our church has not moved forward one iota on this matter since it got egg on its face with the Colin Cook fiasco decades ago.

I see that our mutual South African friend, Dr Peter Swanson, is chairing a panel on conversion therapy. Even Exodus International, the former leading proponent of this "change" therapy, has disavowed it, and formally apologized to all those who were damaged by the organization. All the national medical, psychiatric and mental health associations both in North America and Europe, have stated that conversion therapy is not only ineffective, but damaging. California and New Jersey have banned this therapy for minors in their states. These bans have been upheld by the federal courts.

So why does the brochure for the Cape Town conference even mention this “snake oil cure”?

Let us face the brutal facts: Conversion therapy is so utterly ineffective, that probably the only Adventist “ex-gays”are those self-proclaimed ones presenting at the Cape Town conference. The vast majority of Adventist gays/lesbians are not “ex-gay,” but regrettably, “ex-SDA”!

Decades after I emigrated from South Africa, our iconic statesman, Nelson Mandela came to power. In a revulsion and abhorrence of the rampant racism of Apartheid, it was agreed by all, that there would be absolutely no discrimination in the new South Africa.

Hence it came about that enshrined in the South African constitution, there are equal rights for sexual orientation — the only country on the planet with such a guarantee.

I find it offensively dissonant that our church's hateful, homophobic, and unscientific conference is sullying our lovely land, whose promise is freedom and acceptance for all!

Why did the church not, more suitably, hold the conference in Nigeria or Uganda?

Due to the high crime rate in South Africa, I no longer endanger myself by visiting my homeland. When I want a family reunion, I fly my South African cousins to my home on the French Riviera. Last month I flew my cousins from Cape Town, at considerable personal expense, to my other home in Maui, Hawaii. Knowing the cost of those tickets, I am truly appalled by the extreme wastefulness of the denomination holding this conference at the most extreme tip of Africa. The church seems to be overly flush with cash. I shall think twice about making further donations to the worldwide church body. My own local church congregation is more deserving.

My hope is that no crime will overtake you. Be safe.

ROBIN VANDERMOLEN

Editor's Note: Read the Adventist Review/ANN report on Dr Peter Landless' Wednesday plenary address here.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at http://spectrummagazine.org/node/5877

(George Tichy) #2

This issue actually deserves more discussion since the question is more than legit, why to promote a biased conference about controversial issues in Cape Town?

Was there a prior assumption that the country would have an appropriate background for such, sugesting that their culture would tolerate bias and discrimination better than here in the US or Europe? What was the GC fearing when they avoided doing it here?

Any inputs on this issue?


(Carolyn Parsons) #3

In my opinion, the reasons the was held in South Africa and in city outside of North America and Europe was:

  1. To keep it out of the reach of SDA LGBTIQ activists.
  2. To keep the North American or European news media out of the picture. I can imagine that if the conference was held in city in the US, such as San Francisco, the local media would pay attention and would have been happy to tell the story of the SDA LGBTIQ activists demonstrating on the public sidewalks outside of Moscone Center.
  3. To give a nod to the continent that their general view on LGBTIQ orientation and sexuality was favored by the General Conference.
  4. To reign in the more extreme views on LGBTIQ sexuality on the continent which I think was a legitimate concern.
  5. If you are going to have a boondoggle, why not make it in one of the most beautiful cities in the world with favorable weather and stunning sights?