Workshop Offers the 96% a Chance to Listen

A Sanctuary for Conversation heads to Glendale, California, creating a safe space to ask difficult questions. Chris Blake, recently retired Union College English and communication professor, talks about the importance of precise language, how the workshop came to be, and why people should consider attending.

You are getting ready to take your workshop A Sanctuary for Conversation on the road to Glendale, California on February 3, where you will help Adventists trying to compassionately relate to LGBT+ church members and loved ones while remaining faithful to Scripture. Can you tell us a little more about what the workshop is, and maybe also what it is not?

“We aim to create safe spaces for positive, healing, informed, authentic conversation.” Our agenda is plainly stated on name cards and on the first page of the workbook, and anyone who is not interested in conversation of this sort should give this workshop a pass. Negative, debilitating, ignorant, inauthentic conversation can be found just about anywhere these days anyway.

Directly beneath the agenda on that first page you find: “This workshop faithfully follows the Holy Bible and honors the current position of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.” The workshop isn’t interested in promoting same-sex marriage or bashing Adventism. This is a space where people can grow in their understanding by listening to an Adventist mental health professional, two young adult LGBT+ people who are committed to the Seventh-day Adventist Church, Adventist parents of an LGBT+ child, and one another. We supply a safe space—a sanctuary—to ask questions and express thoughts and concerns in loving ways.

What are the major themes of the workshop?

We concentrate on employing precise language and practicing active listening skills. For example the term “homosexual lifestyle” is a misnomer. No such thing exists, just as there is no heterosexual lifestyle. LGBT+ people visit libraries, attend movies, feed pets, do crossword puzzles, and dine in restaurants. What people often mean by “lifestyle” is more accurately termed “same-sex sex.” If that’s what we mean, that’s what we should say. Sloppy language leads to sloppy thinking.

Another theme is the devastating effects wrought by so-called “change ministries.” For decades, ministries attempted to “change” or “repair” the sexual orientations of people who are LGBT+. In 2013, after existing for 37 years, Exodus International, the largest umbrella ministry for “reparative therapy,” shuttered its doors forever and issued an apology to the LGBT+ community. However well-intentioned we were, the Seventh-day Adventist Church has, tragically, promoted change therapy in the past. As the damage generated by this faulty approach has come to light, we must now admit our error, apologize, and refocus our efforts in realistic, healing directions.

Also, it’s not a sin to be LGBT+. This is the official Adventist Church stance; any other stance is outside official Adventist beliefs. If we believe one’s orientation is sinful, that people need to repent for who they are, then we are saying Jesus was sinful. Yet who would claim that Jesus was sinful and in need of repentance because He was tempted? Too often the unspoken message is, “Shame on you for being tempted!” Sins have to do with behaviors—not temptations, attractions, or orientation.

The target audience is the 96% of us who are not LGBT+. Normally whenever behavior changes are called for, they are aimed at “those other” 4%. Not in this workshop. We speak primarily to the majority and ask, “No matter what our stance is on same-sex marriage, how can our behaviors be more like Jesus?” It helps to place faces and names within the conversation. Otherwise we fall prey to stereotype, isolation, and rejection. One reason for our workshop is to close the fearsome distance to the unknown “they” until we’re saying “we” and “you.”

Can you give us examples of some of the exercises?

Active learning activities are sprinkled throughout A Sanctuary for Conversation. Cross the Line, Central and Peripheral, introductions, Stand for Your Belief, role plays, discussions, and brainstorming solutions make time move quickly. Even introverts enjoy the interactions.

What responses have you received so far?

After our workshop for 80 leaders from Loma Linda University, one participant wrote, “I am moved in ways I didn’t realize I wanted to be on LGBT+. I hope to be a better friend, a safer place, an ally for my friends and others. I have a true flicker of hope that our church can love better. Thank you for the education. Listen, listen more, keep listening.”

During one workshop when I was interviewing the mother of a lesbian young adult I asked, “What gives you hope?”

“This workshop,” she replied, eyes glistening. That resonant hope makes all the work worthwhile.

Are your workshop attendees people who are genuinely struggling with this issue, or do you intend to attract "liberal" Adventists who already relate well to LGBT+ church members? How can you convince conservative church congregations to even begin talking about this issue?

Alita, one of the first things we talk about is how LGBT+ people are not merely an “issue” or a “problem.” (How would any of us like to be constantly referred to as an issue?) LGBT+ are people. Next, we move the conversation from “they” to “those of us who are.” This provides a sea-change in perspective—no more systemic othering.

Our LGBT+ friends are the canaries in the coal mine. How we treat those of us who are different—singles, immigrants, skeptics, chronically depressed, blurters, poor dressers—is how we deserve to be treated.

And oh, I’m so tired of hearing about conservatives and liberals. In Christ there are no conservatives and liberals. Jesus was both, as are His followers. Let’s give dismembering and alienating a rest. We are God’s family.

I will work on my language! What sparked your interest and research for this workshop?

Back in 1989, when I was editor of Insight magazine, I came across this quote from Tim Stafford: “Over 15 years ago I started a column on love and sex for Campus Life, a Christian youth magazine. Among the letters I received was a steady stream from young people who felt sexually attracted to their own gender. Nobody could express more fear and despair. They wanted to be Christians yet feared they were damned.”1

In 1990, Insight published an issue titled, “What We Don’t Talk About.” It included articles about date rape, masturbation, and incest. We intended to include homosexuality also but found the topic as complex and layered as the other three topics combined. So on December 5, 1992, we published “What We Don’t Talk About II” exclusively on LGBT+ people (though that acronym didn’t then exist). I wrote a 7,700-word piece “Redeeming Our Sad Gay Situation,” the first in-depth article of its kind in the Seventh-day Adventist Church. In my research I read hundreds of pages, talked with dozens of people, and attended conferences.

The statistics are alarming. Suicide is the second-leading cause of death among young people ages 10-24. The Trevor Project found that LGBT+ youth are four times more likely to attempt suicide as their straight peers, and LGBT+ youth from highly rejecting families are 8.4 times as likely to have attempted suicide as LGBT+ peers who reported no or low levels of family rejection.

Recently, a survey of 310 Adventist LGBT+ millennials revealed only 11% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they felt comfortable coming out to their parents, with 80.5% saying they were scared to come out because they knew their families would think they were sinful/disgusting. When they did come out, only 25.9% had parents who communicated they “loved me no matter what.” Moreover, nearly two-thirds (65.7%) disagreed with the statement, “My religious congregation is an important source of support to me.”2 Yet, astoundingly, in a 2015 Pew Research Center report, 48% of LGBT+ Americans identify as Christians, up from 42% in 2013.

Within Adventist churches many people don’t talk to one another about things that really matter here and now—and they certainly don’t listen to one another. What sort of holy hell is this? It’s time for climate change in Adventism, one that creates renewable energy through love that listens and produces more light, less heat.

How much time have you put into developing and giving these workshops? How are they funded?

In the three years since we started in March, 2015, we have spent hundreds of hours listening to everyone from Kinship to Coming Out Ministries, from small church members to high-ranking administrators, from every conceivable tone and hue in the spiritual spectrum. And we’ve made lots of adjustments. We model the listening we’re promoting.

A Sanctuary for Conversation workshops are funded by the sponsoring/hosting organizations. Details are available at

What response have you received from the official Adventist church?

The workshop began at the behest of the official church. Our first presentation was to 100 youth workers at the North American Division (NAD) Youth Ministries Summit in Lincoln, Nebraska. That first workshop required a day-and-a-half. Then we presented for four hours to 140 pastors at the NAD Pastoral “Called” Convention in Austin, Texas, on June 30, 2015, a week before the General Conference session. Since then, we honed A Sanctuary for Conversation to a trim three hours, including a refreshment break.

What has been the most difficult thing about putting this workshop together?

Getting beyond pontificating to enacting practical individual and systemic changes. Ignorance is understandable; willful ignorance is unacceptable.

As always, the most difficult obstacle is fear. That’s why Jesus keeps repeating, again and again, “Don’t be afraid. Fear not.” The ultimate motivational choice is fear or love.

For Adventists, the five top conversational fears regarding LGBT+ people are:

  1. “Am I going against Scripture and Jesus by opening this conversation?”
  2. “If I talk with an LGBT+ person will I become one myself? Could others I care about ‘catch it’?”
  3. “Will we have a gay pride parade in the lobby next week?”
  4. “By engaging in this conversation, am I supporting behavior I don’t agree with?”
  5. What will other people think?

We deal with each fear in the workshop. Actually some of these fears might even be reflected in the Spectrum comments below. (Laughs.)

How can people attend the Glendale workshop for the Southern California area?

A Sanctuary for Conversation is officially set for Saturday, February 3, 2:30-5:30 p.m. at Glendale Adventist Medical Center’s auditorium. Because space is limited participants must sign up through the following:

1Tim Stafford. “Coming Out.” Christianity Today, Aug. 18, 1989.

2Curtis J. VanderWaal, David Sedlacek, and Lauren Lane. “The Impact of Family Rejection or Acceptance among LGBT+ Millennials in the Seventh-day Adventist Church.” Social Work & Christianity, Vol. 44, No. 1 & 2 (2017), pp. 72-95.

After 24 years as associate professor of English and communication at Union College, Chris Blake retired last May. He now writes full-time, pursues activist peacemaking, and plays riotously with his four grandchildren.

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

First off Ted. Wilson needs to improve his listening ability. His popish stance seems to be aninherited state. When it comes to WO or origins he is without eyes or ears. . There is a compelling connotation between call, appointed,commissioned, designated, installed, and ordained. one need but look at Deborah, Esther, Mary,Elizabeth, Dorcas, Vettng should be on qualifications not gonads. Since Spicer the church has been a struggle with cultism. It has enjoyed a few good years ,but none recently.


Oh, Chris, I am so very thankful for people like you and Daneen and Stephen! My heart has been broken over and over by the stories I’ve heard of pain and rejection by families and the church - the very places where one should be able to turn for understanding and love. Keep up the good work! My generation of closed-minded, stiff-necked Pharisees will be gone soon, and our church will be able to reach out in love to these precious sons and daughters of ours!


You offer a workshop for the 96% to listen.
Due to the depletion of LGBT adults in Adventism, your title,should read:
WE OFFER A WORKSHOP FOR THE 99.5% to listen.

The demographics of gay/ lesbian babies is about one child in 25, or four per cent

This demographic holds across many racial / ethnic lines and includes families of every doctrinal persuasion.

I recently asked a good friend of mine, who pastors a 1500 member Adventist church, how many adult gay/lesbian members he could identify in his church’s pews on any given Sabbath.

If 800 adults are in attendance, then a normal proportion of four per cent would mean there would be 32 LGBT congregants worshipping.

This very astute pastor, who has ministered to his congregation for years,
could not identify ONE LGBT believer attending his worship hour on a regular basis. And he is a very liberated and tolerant/compassionate man,
vis a vis the LGBT community.

This distressing absence of LGBT’s in the pews, is because the shaming and the shunning, the disparagement, and disrespect, have ensured that most LGBT Adventists “vote with their feet”

So Ted Wilson’s frequent diatribes against homosexuality, are addressed to a minuscule sliver of the adult church body.

Why never even a whisper from Ted, about the sexual sins of the remaining
99.5 per cent of heterosexual members? What is his obsession with gay sex??


Interesting, the first quote while being more specific is called sloppy language, While orientation which is a far broader term seems somehow acceptable.

Here is probably a worse example of sloppy language. The Greek word for tempted is also the word for tested. James tells us that to be tempted is to be led by ones own lusts: "“But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.” James 1:15. Obviously Jesus could not have been tempted by every temptation known to mankind…He would not have had time for anything else. So the meaning is that He was tested and shown to be without sin.

From the workshop: “Christians believe Jesus was ‘in every respect tempted as we are, yet without sin’ (Hebrews 4:15). ‘Every respect’ of course doesn’t mean He was necessarily tempted by cell phone addiction or infatuation with movie celebrities or same-sex sex. Jesus was tempted in many and various human ways.”

The point remains: Temptations do not mean sins. No amount of linguistic dancing can honestly get around that point. It follows then that sexual orientation–which refers simply to sexual attraction–is not sinful in and of itself. To assert otherwise, to maintain that temptations/tests are themselves sinful, is to leave all people in abject hopelessness and unrelenting despair.

Fortunately the liberating gospel of Jesus Christ is better than that.


Thanks for offering this workshop! I look forward to being there and participating in this learning exercise.

1 Like

It is so glad to see that this workshop is taking place again. It is such a wonderful event. If we talked and listened more as congregations and groups, rather than having documents/position statements handed out by church leaders, we’d all be better off.


Add on to the Sixth Fears: The Church and State has no business in the bedrooms of the nation.

1 Like